These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11231515)

  • 1. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science-free GM good tests advance.
    Peerenboom E
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 9702761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proposed rules issued for bioengineered foods.
    Formanek R
    FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 11444252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
    McHughen A; Smyth S
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
    Reardon S
    Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toxicology. Panel urges further study of biotech corn.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1867. PubMed ID: 11187032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
    Powell K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GM food singled out for labeling in the US.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):375. PubMed ID: 10748509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are bioengineered foods safe?. Interview by Larry Thompson.
    Henney JE
    FDA Consum; 2000; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 10732496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US reforms rules for telling public about GM food.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):108. PubMed ID: 10821240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
    Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
    FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uninformation and the choice paradox.
    McHughen A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Oct; 18(10):1018-9. PubMed ID: 11016993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.