These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11233353)

  • 1. Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: a multiple constituency approach.
    Zinn J; Zalokowski A; Hunter L
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2001; 26(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 11233353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do you measure up? Start using benchmarking tactics as a yardstick for success.
    Gray SP
    Healthc Inform; 1999 Feb; 16(2):183-4, 186, 188 passim. PubMed ID: 10346434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing key laboratory performance indicators: a feasibility study. Potential roles for CLMA.
    Zinn J; Getzen T
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1995; 9(3):178-98. PubMed ID: 10143165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The strategic role of health informatics in integrated delivery systems.
    Currie GA
    J Healthc Qual; 1998; 20(5):4-7; quiz 15. PubMed ID: 10185721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of reorganization on laboratory quality: preliminary findings and lessons learned.
    Francis D; Christian L; Peddecord KM; Wiesner C; Tucker ES
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(5):293-305. PubMed ID: 12298436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new organization of the health care delivery system.
    Shortell SM; Hull KE
    Baxter Health Policy Rev; 1996; 2():101-48. PubMed ID: 11066258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clear pathway to success. Integrated care management tools for managing cost and quality.
    Flateland JS
    Cost Qual Q J; 1997 Apr; 3(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 10167028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Success in managed care: improving clinical quality.
    Cigich SM; Mischler NE
    Physician Exec; 1997 Apr; 23(4):24-31. PubMed ID: 10166536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating health plan quality 2: survey design principles for measuring health plan quality.
    Wholey DR; Christianson JB; Finch M; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP65-75. PubMed ID: 12822716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Charting reengineering potential: a PFCA benchmark study. A first look at outcome measures across reengineering hospitals.
    Harlin T; Schmid E
    PFCA Rev; 1996; ():2-20. PubMed ID: 10164540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facing the challenge of the '90s. Interview by Tyler L. Chin.
    Keever GW
    Health Data Manag; 1998 Oct; 6(10):40, 42, 44-6. PubMed ID: 10185883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beware the myths of network ownership and control; agility is better than size.
    Hagland M
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1997 Feb; 15(2):17. PubMed ID: 10164869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of the Delphi panel for consensus development on indicators of laboratory performance.
    Zinn J; Zalokowski A
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1999; 13(6):386-408. PubMed ID: 10747665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing the hospital workforce: what is the role of human resource management practices?
    Rondeau KV; Wagar TH
    Hosp Top; 2002; 80(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 12073684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating health plan quality 1: a conceptual model.
    Wholey DR; Christianson JB; Finch M; Knutson D; Rockwood T; Warrick L;
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jun; 9 Spec No 2():SP53-64. PubMed ID: 12822715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Managed care system requirements of integrated delivery systems.
    McPhail JR
    Healthc Inf Manage; 1995; 9(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 10155802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Campbell SM; Hann M; Roland MO; Quayle JA; Shekelle PG
    Med Care; 1999 Sep; 37(9):964-8. PubMed ID: 10493474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the Delphi panel method to develop consensus on laboratory performance indicators.
    Zinn J
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1998; 12(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 10178715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospice quality improvement programs: an initial examination.
    D'Onofrio CN;
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2001 Jul; 15(4):29-47. PubMed ID: 11452640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of what clinicians should know.
    Shueman SA; Shore M
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 1997 Sep; 25(1):71-81; discussion 83-93. PubMed ID: 9727233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.