These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11233584)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
    Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians.
    Everett SA; Price JH; Bedell AW; Telljohann SK
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Jun; 20(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 10183321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing response rates in physicians' mail surveys: an experimental study.
    Maheux B; Legault C; Lambert J
    Am J Public Health; 1989 May; 79(5):638-9. PubMed ID: 2705601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.
    Grava-Gubins I; Scott S
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18854472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of responses to a US 2 dollar bill versus a chance to win 250 US dollars in a mail survey of emergency physicians.
    Tamayo-Sarver JH; Baker DW
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Aug; 11(8):888-91. PubMed ID: 15289200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applying mail response enhancement techniques to health care surveys: a cost-benefit approach.
    Finlay J; Thistlethwaite PC
    Health Mark Q; 1992; 10(1-2):91-102. PubMed ID: 10124799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
    VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Means of increasing response rates in a Norwegian dietary survey among infants - results from a pseudo-randomized pilot study.
    Myhre JB; Andersen LF; Holvik K; Astrup H; Kristiansen AL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):144. PubMed ID: 31288751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response rates to surveys with self-addressed, stamped envelopes versus a self-addressed label.
    Groves BW; Olsson RH
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1226-8. PubMed ID: 10932585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs.
    Raziano DB; Jayadevappa R; Valenzula D; Weiner M; Lavizzo-Mourey R
    Gerontologist; 2001 Dec; 41(6):799-804. PubMed ID: 11723348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.
    Spry VM; Hovell MF; Sallis JG; Hofsteter CR; Elder JP; Molgaard CA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Jul; 130(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 2741903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys [ISRCTN32203485].
    Roberts LM; Wilson S; Roalfe A; Bridge P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):30. PubMed ID: 15533256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating patients' experiences with individual physicians: a randomized trial of mail, internet, and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys.
    Rodriguez HP; von Glahn T; Rogers WH; Chang H; Fanjiang G; Safran DG
    Med Care; 2006 Feb; 44(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16434916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mail survey of United States hematologists and oncologists: a comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes.
    Streiff MB; Dundes L; Spivak JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 54(4):430-2. PubMed ID: 11297894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lottery ticket was more effective than a prize draw in increasing questionnaire response among cancer survivors.
    Drummond FJ; O'Leary E; Sharp L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):769-75. PubMed ID: 25704725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. User-experience surveys with maternity services: a randomized comparison of two data collection models.
    Bjertnaes OA; Iversen HH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Aug; 24(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 22687704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.