BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11234034)

  • 1. First Bush budget set to favour life sciences.
    Davis M
    Nature; 2001 Feb; 409(6823):969. PubMed ID: 11234034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. U.S. research funding. Physical sciences need boost, advisory panel tells Bush.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5587):1622. PubMed ID: 12215613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):714-5. PubMed ID: 18258869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gore pledges support for bioscience.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2000 Sep; 407(6801):118. PubMed ID: 11001023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science policy. A budget with big winners and losers.
    Kintisch E; Mervis J
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5762):762-4. PubMed ID: 16469890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 2004 science budget. Congress wants the twain to meet.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5632):444. PubMed ID: 12881536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
    Lawler A; Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US life scientists seek 15 per cent rise to NIH research funds.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6717):284. PubMed ID: 9950418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bush goes to war as budget boosts R&D.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6872):564. PubMed ID: 11832897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5597):1313. PubMed ID: 12434024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US scientists seek more funds for high-tech equipment.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6792):112. PubMed ID: 10910321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health-funding boost not enough for Canada.
    McElhaney RN
    Nature; 2001 May; 411(6835):237. PubMed ID: 11357101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5814):927. PubMed ID: 17303728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 2003 budget. War effort shapes U.S. budget, with some program casualties.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Feb; 295(5557):952-4. PubMed ID: 11834796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Senator seeks reassurance on NIH budget.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6715):94. PubMed ID: 9923666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Under new management.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2001 Dec 20-27; 414(6866):839. PubMed ID: 11780025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gridlock stalls NIH budget rise.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 Dec; 408(6813):627. PubMed ID: 11130032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. research spending. Scientists feel the pain as 2007 budget outlook grows dark.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1666-7. PubMed ID: 17170258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. U.S. budget. Biomedicine gets record raise as Congress sets 2002 spending.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5552):24-5. PubMed ID: 11778015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Republican warns of $35-billion cut in 1996 budget.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1995 Jan; 373(6512):272. PubMed ID: 7830753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.