These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11234441)

  • 1. [Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAEs) and newborn hearing screening: a feasibility and performance study].
    Pelosi G; Hatzopoulos S; Chierici R; Vigi V; Martini A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2000 Aug; 20(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 11234441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing otoacoustic emission protocols for a UNHS program.
    Hatzopoulos S; Petruccelli J; Ciorba A; Martini A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 18663294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
    Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A preliminary study of a hearing screening model for newborn].
    Liu Z; Bu X; Xing G; Lu L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 12762000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
    Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions when screening hearing in preschool children in a community setting.
    Dille M; Glattke TJ; Earl BR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Nov; 71(11):1789-95. PubMed ID: 17870187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neonatal hearing screening: evaluation of tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emission test criteria.
    McPherson B; Li SF; Shi BX; Tang JL; Wong BY
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 16672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening].
    Liao H; Wu Z; Zhou T
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12764789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of a linear TEOAE protocol in hearing screening of neonates: feasibility study].
    Pelosi G; Hatzopoulos S; Chierici R; Vigi V; Martini A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Aug; 18(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 10205919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
    Dort JC; Tobolski C; Brown D
    J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the first year in term infants: a longitudinal study.
    Zang Z; Jiang ZD
    Brain Dev; 2007 Jul; 29(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 17113742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.