164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11234737)
1. Validation studies in epidemiology: the relative precision of different designs.
Wong M; Day NE
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 11234737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.
Day NE; Wong MY; Bingham S; Khaw KT; Luben R; Michels KB; Welch A; Wareham NJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1373-81. PubMed ID: 15333617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlated errors in biased surrogates: study designs and methods for measurement error correction.
Spiegelman D; Zhao B; Kim J
Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1657-82. PubMed ID: 15736283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
Varma S; Simon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1074-81. PubMed ID: 16709616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple model for potential use with a misclassified binary outcome in epidemiology.
Duffy SW; Warwick J; Williams AR; Keshavarz H; Kaffashian F; Rohan TE; Nili F; Sadeghi-Hassanabadi A
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):712-7. PubMed ID: 15252078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
Miller F
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method of bias correction for maximal reliability with dichotomous measures.
Penev S; Raykov T
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):163-75. PubMed ID: 19397846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of biomarker measurement error on epidemiological studies.
White E
IARC Sci Publ; 1997; (142):73-93. PubMed ID: 9354913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjusting a relative-risk estimate for study imperfections.
Maldonado G
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2008 Jul; 62(7):655-63. PubMed ID: 18559450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.
Wakefield J; Haneuse SJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 167(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 18270370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating error rates in the classification of paired organs.
Brenning A; Lausen B
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4515-31. PubMed ID: 18465836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The investigation and correction of recall bias for an ordinal response in a case-control study.
Barry D; Livingstone V
Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):965-75. PubMed ID: 15977299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multivariate method for measurement error correction using pairs of concentration biomarkers.
Fraser GE; Yan R
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 17140813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.
Zhang L; Mukherjee B; Ghosh M; Gruber S; Moreno V
Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2756-83. PubMed ID: 17879261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Proper handling of correlated data in rehabilitation research].
Kuss O; Watzke S
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2005 Dec; 44(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 16320181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Instrumental variables: application and limitations.
Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
Epidemiology; 2006 May; 17(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 16617274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of magnitude in gene-environment interactions in the presence of measurement error.
Wong MY; Day NE; Luan JA; Wareham NJ
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):987-98. PubMed ID: 15027084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
