These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11235516)

  • 21. The validity of screening for open-angle glaucoma in high-risk populations with single-test screening mode frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT).
    Kamdeu Fansi AA; Li G; Harasymowycz PJ
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Mar; 20(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 20436361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Population and high-risk group screening for glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.
    Francis BA; Varma R; Vigen C; Lai MY; Winarko J; Nguyen B; Azen S;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(9):6257-64. PubMed ID: 21245400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
    Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sector-based analysis of frequency doubling technology sensitivity and optic nerve head shape parameters.
    Iester M; Sangermani C; De Feo F; Ungaro N; Cicinelli S; Tardini MG; Calabria G; Gandolfi S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 17415696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
    Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.
    Yamada N; Chen PP; Mills RP; Leen MM; Lieberman MF; Stamper RL; Stanford DC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Nov; 117(11):1479-84. PubMed ID: 10565516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Staging of functional damage in glaucoma using frequency doubling technology.
    Brusini P; Tosoni C
    J Glaucoma; 2003 Oct; 12(5):417-26. PubMed ID: 14520150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Potential of stratus optical coherence tomography for detecting early glaucoma in perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field loss.
    Zhang Y; Wu LL; Yang YF
    J Glaucoma; 2010 Jan; 19(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20075675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Felletti M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The methodology of visual field testing with frequency doubling technology in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2006.
    Terry AL; Paulose-Ram R; Tilert TJ; Johnson CA; Zhang X; Lee PP; Saaddine JB
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 17(6):411-21. PubMed ID: 21090914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimizing the use of frequency doubling technology perimetry in community vision screenings.
    Nehmad L; Madonna RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 18594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry.
    Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New perimetric techniques: a comparison between rarebit and frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Martin L; Wanger P
    J Glaucoma; 2004 Aug; 13(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 15226653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combined evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for glaucoma detection using automated classification.
    Horn FK; Lämmer R; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Michelson G; Lausen B; Adler W
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21173705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry.
    Iester M; Altieri M; Vittone P; Calabria G; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 12504694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage as assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with a visual field defect detected by frequency doubling technology perimetry but not by standard automated perimetry.
    Kim TW; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sample PA; Shah N; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1053-7. PubMed ID: 17239441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.