These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11235518)

  • 1. Comparison between results obtained with traditional perimetry and those with frequency doubling perimetry in initial phase chronic simple glaucoma.
    Cagigrigoriu A; Rabbione MM; Onnis E; Fea A; Salvini S; Brogliatti B; Grignolo FM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (232):24-6. PubMed ID: 11235518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different value scales between frequency-doubling technique and standard threshold perimetry.
    Iester M; Traverso CE; Capris P; Vittone P; Zingirian M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (232):26-7. PubMed ID: 11235519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of screening for open-angle glaucoma in high-risk populations with single-test screening mode frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT).
    Kamdeu Fansi AA; Li G; Harasymowycz PJ
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Mar; 20(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 20436361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency doubling technology and Octopus visual field.
    Iester M; Mennoud A; Schnyder C
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (232):23-4. PubMed ID: 11235517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma early diagnosis.
    Brusini P; Busatto P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1998; (227):23-4. PubMed ID: 9972331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined use of frequency doubling perimetry and polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma detection.
    Horn FK; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 12566019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression.
    Artes PH; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4700-8. PubMed ID: 19458326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of matrix perimetry with octopus perimetry for assessing glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Lan YW; Hsieh JW; Sun FJ
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20436367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of frequency doubling technology (FDT) in glaucoma screening.
    Quaranta GM; Vetrugno M; Trabucco T; Cantatore F; Cardia L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (232):21-3. PubMed ID: 11235516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma.
    Matsuo H; Tomita G; Suzuki Y; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2002 Dec; 11(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 12483088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
    Gonzalez de la Rosa M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 152(3):500-501. PubMed ID: 21855674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between optic nerve fibre polarimetry and automated perimetry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    De Gregorio F; Stecchi G; Angelini MJ; Sedran L; Virno M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (232):31-2. PubMed ID: 11235522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between indices of Humphrey matrix and Humphrey perimetry in early glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Hong S; Yeom HY; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie); 2007; 39(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 18025653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry and standard achromatic computerized perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Serguhn S; Spiegel D
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 239(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 11482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice.
    Brusini P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 130(6):859-60. PubMed ID: 11192559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.