302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11235681)
1. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.
Singh D; Maley RH; Santucci T; Macherey RS; Bartley S; Weyant RJ; Landreneau RJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Feb; 71(2):419-24. PubMed ID: 11235681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.
Honkoop P; Siersema PD; Tilanus HW; Stassen LP; Hop WC; van Blankenstein M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jun; 111(6):1141-6; discussion 1147-8. PubMed ID: 8642814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?
Ercan S; Rice TW; Murthy SC; Rybicki LA; Blackstone EH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 15746747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses.
Beitler AL; Urschel JD
Am J Surg; 1998 Apr; 175(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 9568667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution and critical appraisal of anastomotic technique following resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Casson AG; Porter GA; Veugelers PJ
Dis Esophagus; 2002; 15(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 12472475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.
Lam TC; Fok M; Cheng SW; Wong J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Aug; 104(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 1495302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.
Orringer MB; Marshall B; Iannettoni MD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Feb; 119(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 10649203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Modified application of circular stapler to cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Yan M; Chen YH; Liu XB; Shao LF; Li Y
Ai Zheng; 2009 Jul; 28(7):768-70. PubMed ID: 19624907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M
World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis: results following esophagectomy for carcinoma.
Heitmiller RF; Fischer A; Liddicoat JR
Dis Esophagus; 1999; 12(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 10770360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
