These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Informed consent as a form of volunteer bias. Edlund MJ; Craig TJ; Richardson MA Am J Psychiatry; 1985 May; 142(5):624-7. PubMed ID: 2858983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A research agenda for understanding participation in clinical research. Gross D Res Nurs Health; 2006 Jun; 29(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 16676344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Providing research participants with findings from completed cancer-related clinical trials: not quite as simple as it sounds. Markman M Cancer; 2006 Apr; 106(7):1421-4. PubMed ID: 16502435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Phase I cancer trials. A collusion of misunderstanding. Miller M Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4):34-43. PubMed ID: 10971892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Informed consent for dementia research: the study enrollment encounter. Black BS; Kass NE; Fogarty LA; Rabins PV IRB; 2007; 29(4):7-14. PubMed ID: 17847621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. Jefford M; Moore R Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Increasing minority patient participation in cancer clinical trials using oncology nurse navigation. Holmes DR; Major J; Lyonga DE; Alleyne RS; Clayton SM Am J Surg; 2012 Apr; 203(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 21996347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The process of clinical trials: a model for successful clinical trial participation. Lengacher CA; Gonzalez LL; Giuliano R; Bennett MP; Cox CE; Reintgen DS Oncol Nurs Forum; 2001 Aug; 28(7):1115-20. PubMed ID: 11517845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can we ensure that all research subjects give valid consent? Wendler D Arch Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 164(20):2201-4. PubMed ID: 15534155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethics of clinical trials from bayesian perspective: patients make fully informed choices about entry to trials. Kunkler IH BMJ; 2003 Jun; 326(7404):1457. PubMed ID: 12829566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Does waiver of written informed consent from the institutional review board affect response rate in a low-risk research study? Krousel-Wood M; Muntner P; Jannu A; Hyre A; Breault J J Investig Med; 2006 May; 54(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 17152856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does informed consent to research require comprehension? Sreenivasan G Lancet; 2003 Dec; 362(9400):2016-8. PubMed ID: 14683665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Providing research participants with findings from completed cancer-related clinical trials: not quite as simple as it sounds. Fernandez CV; Shurin S; Kodish E Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1419-20; author reply 1420. PubMed ID: 16862571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. What's missing from current clinical trial guidelines? A framework for integrating science, ethics, and the community context. Sutherland HJ; Meslin EM; Till JE J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 7749174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Informed consent in medical research. Subjects may be coerced into participating in studies. Wilmshurst P BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7092):1481. PubMed ID: 9167583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Informed consent, participation in, and withdrawal from a population based cohort study involving genetic analysis. Matsui K; Kita Y; Ueshima H J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):385-92. PubMed ID: 15994356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]