These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11236887)

  • 1. An improved data acquisition method for electrical impedance tomography.
    Kerner TE; Harto A; Osterman KS; DeLorenzo C; Paulsen KD
    Physiol Meas; 2001 Feb; 22(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 11236887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns.
    Kolehmainen V; Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Nov; 18(4):289-303. PubMed ID: 9413863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical impedance tomography with compensation for electrode positioning variations.
    Blott BH; Daniell GJ; Meeson S
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1731-9. PubMed ID: 9651036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconstruction of conductivity changes due to ventilation and perfusion from EIT data collected on a rectangular electrode array.
    Mueller JL; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    Physiol Meas; 2001 Feb; 22(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 11236896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current patterns and electrode types for single-source electrical impedance tomography of the thorax.
    Schuessler TF; Bates JH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1998; 26(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 9525765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Paulsen K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):829-38. PubMed ID: 15250635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient Simultaneous Reconstruction of Time-Varying Images and Electrode Contact Impedances in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Boverman G; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ; Kao TJ; Amm BC; Wang X; Davenport DM; Chong DH; Sahni R; Ashe JM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Apr; 64(4):795-806. PubMed ID: 27295649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 8375870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast EIT using a new projected image reconstruction method with multi-frequency measurements.
    Lee E; Ts ME; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):751-65. PubMed ID: 22532397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction of electrode modelling errors in multi-frequency EIT imaging.
    Jehl M; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):893-903. PubMed ID: 27206237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A high-precision voltage source for EIT.
    Saulnier GJ; Ross AS; Liu N
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S221-36. PubMed ID: 16636413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of domain shape modeling and measurement errors on the 2-D D-bar method for EIT.
    Murphy EK; Mueller JL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Oct; 28(10):1576-84. PubMed ID: 19447702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A high frequency electrical impedance tomograph using distributed parallel input channels.
    Jossinet J; Trillaud C; Risacher F; McAdams ET
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 8052171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 128-electrode three dimensional electrical impedance tomography system.
    Xu G; Wang R; Zhang S; Yang S; Justin GA; Sun M; Yan W
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4386-9. PubMed ID: 18002976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct EIT reconstructions of complex admittivities on a chest-shaped domain in 2-D.
    Hamilton SJ; Mueller JL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Apr; 32(4):757-69. PubMed ID: 23314771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.