These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11237364)

  • 21. The relationship between allocentric and egocentric frames of reference and categorical and coordinate spatial information processing.
    Ruotolo F; van der Ham IJ; Iachini T; Postma A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1138-56. PubMed ID: 21271464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interhemispheric interaction in bilateral redundancy gain: effects of stimulus format.
    Marks NL; Hellige JB
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):578-93. PubMed ID: 14599271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Laeng B; Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20441992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual field differences in spatial frequency discrimination.
    Niebauer CL; Christman SD
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Dec; 41(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 10585243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Vijayakumar N; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 19231481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial information is processed even when it is task-irrelevant: implications for neuroimaging task design.
    Meegan DV; Honsberger MJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 25(4):1043-55. PubMed ID: 15850723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does a causal relation exist between the functional hemispheric asymmetries of visual processing subsystems?
    Andresen DR; Marsolek CJ
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Nov; 59(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 16157436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Categorical versus Coordinate Spatial Processing: Effects of Blurring and Hemispheric Asymmetry.
    Cowin EL; Hellige JB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1994; 6(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 23962368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual field x response hand interactions and level priming in the processing of laterally presented hierarchical stimuli.
    Wendt M; Vietze I; Kluwe RH
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16901597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How do patients with neglect see a horizontal line? Analysis of performances in coloured line bisection task.
    Misonou K; Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Nakano N
    J Neurol; 2004 Jun; 251(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 15311345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Coding categorical and coordinate spatial relations in visual-spatial short-term memory.
    Dent K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2372-87. PubMed ID: 19440929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS.
    Trojano L; Conson M; Maffei R; Grossi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1569-74. PubMed ID: 16529780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What kind of visual spatial attention is impaired in neglect?
    Natale E; Posteraro L; Prior M; Marzi CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(7):1072-85. PubMed ID: 15769493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hemispheric differences for visual matrix processing: stimulus size and spatial frequency effects.
    Pedersen HK; Polich J
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):525-38. PubMed ID: 11748906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A left cerebral hemisphere's superiority in processing spatial-categorical information in a non-verbal semantic format.
    Suegami T; Laeng B
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):294-302. PubMed ID: 23290044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.