115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11240709)
1. Combined diagnostic imaging of uterine carcinosarcoma: A case report.
Umesaki N; Tanaka T; Miyama M; Ogita S; Ochi H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2000 Sep; 10(5):425-428. PubMed ID: 11240709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose of uterine sarcoma: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and power Doppler imaging.
Umesaki N; Tanaka T; Miyama M; Kawamura N; Ogita S; Kawabe J; Okamura T; Koyama K; Ochi H
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Mar; 80(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 11263934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abnormal uterine cavity: differential diagnosis with MR imaging.
Imaoka I; Sugimura K; Masui T; Takehara Y; Ichijo K; Naito M
Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Dec; 17(10):1445-55. PubMed ID: 10609993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: MRI findings including diffusion-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Harada M
Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 26787673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uterine contractions: possible diagnostic pitfall at MR imaging.
Togashi K; Kawakami S; Kimura I; Asato R; Okumura R; Fukuoka M; Mori T; Konishi J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(6):889-93. PubMed ID: 8280979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: transvaginal sonography vs contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Mizutani H; Torashima M; Takahashi M; Miyazaki K; Okamura H; Ushijima H; Ohtake H; Tokunaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 8352114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging appearance of the uterus in postmenopausal women receiving tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer: histopathologic correlation.
Ascher SM; Johnson JC; Barnes WA; Bae CJ; Patt RH; Zeman RK
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 8657895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laser ablation of the endometrium: MR appearance during and after treatment and the relation of MR appearance to clinical outcome.
deSouza NM; McMillan DL; Puni RK; Coutts GA; Hall AS; Harris DN; Young IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 8911162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of MR Imaging as a Tool to Differentiate between the Major Histological Types of Uterine Sarcomas.
Sumi A; Terasaki H; Sanada S; Uchida M; Tomioka Y; Kamura T; Yano H; Abe T
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2015; 14(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 26104072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging of thymic epithelial tumors.
Kushihashi T; Fujisawa H; Munechika H
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1996 Aug; 37(3):191-259. PubMed ID: 8872410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma originating from the uterine endometrium: a report on magnetic resonance features of 2 cases with very rare and aggressive tumor.
Makihara N; Maeda T; Nishimura M; Deguchi M; Sonoyama A; Nakabayashi K; Kawakami F; Itoh T; Yamada H
Rare Tumors; 2012 Jun; 4(3):e37. PubMed ID: 23087793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hypointense thrombus on T2-weighted MR imaging: a potential pitfall in the diagnosis of dural sinus thrombosis.
Hinman JM; Provenzale JM
Eur J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 41(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 11809544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preliminary experience with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for uterine neoplasms.
Hirano Y; Kubo K; Hirai Y; Okada S; Yamada K; Sawano S; Yamashita T; Hiramatsu Y
Radiographics; 1992 Mar; 12(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 1561414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: MR findings.
Tanaka YO; Tsunoda H; Minami R; Yoshikawa H; Minami M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Aug; 28(2):434-9. PubMed ID: 18666176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate.
Weinreb JC; Barkoff ND; Megibow A; Demopoulos R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 2105017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging features of uterine adenomyomas.
Song SE; Sung DJ; Park BJ; Kim MJ; Cho SB; Kim KA
Abdom Imaging; 2011 Aug; 36(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 20652694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian carcinosarcoma: correlation to the clinicopathological findings].
Ling Y; Feng CY; Xia SM; Shen LH; Luo LQ; Zhang HY
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1648-50. PubMed ID: 20650791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR images of ovarian carcinosarcoma.
Saito A; Kuwatsuru R; Ogishima D; Irimoto M; Maehara T; Katayama H; Matsumoto T
Radiat Med; 1999; 17(6):447-50. PubMed ID: 10646984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K
Radiographics; 2011; 31(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 21257936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endometrial cancer: magnetic resonance imaging.
Manfredi R; Gui B; Maresca G; Fanfani F; Bonomo L
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(5):626-36. PubMed ID: 15886951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
