These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11241126)
1. Transfer function index of pulse volume recordings: a new method for vein graft surveillance. Ihlberg LH; Mätzke S; Albäck NA; Roth WD; Sovijärvi AR; Lepäntalo M J Vasc Surg; 2001 Mar; 33(3):546-53. PubMed ID: 11241126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfer function index: is it a reliable method for vein graft surveillance? Tan CP; Civil I ANZ J Surg; 2003 Dec; 73(12):1032-5. PubMed ID: 14632899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidentally detected stenoses proximal to grafts originating below the common femoral artery: do they affect graft patency or warrant repair in asymptomatic patients? Treiman GS; Ashrafi A; Lawrence PF J Vasc Surg; 2000 Dec; 32(6):1180-9. PubMed ID: 11107091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing the development of vein-graft stenosis and their significance for clinical management. Idu MM; Buth J; Hop WC; Cuypers P; van de Pavoordt ED; Tordoir JM Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Jan; 17(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 10071612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The natural history of intermediate and critical vein graft stenosis: recommendations for continued surveillance or repair. Mills JL; Wixon CL; James DC; Devine J; Westerband A; Hughes JD J Vasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 33(2):273-8; discussion 278-80. PubMed ID: 11174778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impedance analysis compared with Quickscan in the detection of graft-related stenoses. Zhang Q; Houghton AD; Derodra J; King DH; Reidy JF; Taylor PR Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1995 Feb; 9(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 7627656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts. Jackson MR; Belott TP; Dickason T; Kaiser WJ; Modrall JG; Valentine RJ; Clagett GP J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):498-504; 504-5. PubMed ID: 10957656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: a study of 379 reversed vein grafts. Mills JL; Harris EJ; Taylor LM; Beckett WC; Porter JM J Vasc Surg; 1990 Oct; 12(4):379-86; discussion 387-9. PubMed ID: 2214034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impedance analysis to identify the at risk femorodistal graft. Wyatt MG; Muir RM; Tennant WG; Scott DJ; Baird RN; Horrocks M J Vasc Surg; 1991 Feb; 13(2):284-91; discussion 292-3. PubMed ID: 1824953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noninvasive impedance in graft surveillance. Davies AH; Horrocks M Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1992; 81(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 1622087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]