234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11241260)
1. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases.
Krane JF; Granter SR; Trask CE; Hogan CL; Lee KR
Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11241260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tubal metaplasia. A frequent potential pitfall in the cytologic diagnosis of endocervical glandular dysplasia on cervical smears.
Novotny DB; Maygarden SJ; Johnson DE; Frable WJ
Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1546503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings.
Costa MJ; Kenny MB; Naib ZM
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 1994621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. A study of 34 cases.
Lee KR; Minter LJ; Granter SR
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jan; 107(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 8980364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endocervical glandular atypia in Papanicolaou smears.
Goff BA; Atanasoff P; Brown E; Muntz HG; Bell DA; Rice LW
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jan; 79(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 1727566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear.
van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance of MiB-1 staining in smears with atypical glandular cells.
Boon ME; Vinkestein A; van Binsbergen-Ingelse A; van Haaften C
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Aug; 31(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15282717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytologic findings in 13 cases.
Zhou C; Hayes MM; Clement PB; Thomson TA
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 9801202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human papillomavirus (HPV) test and PAP smear as predictors of outcome in conservatively treated adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix.
Costa S; Negri G; Sideri M; Santini D; Martinelli G; Venturoli S; Pelusi C; Syrjanen S; Syrjanen K; Pelusi G
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 17481701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical and vaginal cytologic smears suggestive of adenocarcinoma.
Pretorius R; Binstock M; Sadeghi M; Hodges W
J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8829059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies.
Gay JD; Donaldson LD; Goellner JR
Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(6):1043-6. PubMed ID: 3866457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive value of diagnoses of endocervical glandular abnormalities in cervical smears.
Segal A; Frost FA; Miranda A; Fletcher C; Sterrett GF
Pathology; 2003 Jun; 35(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 14506961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of post-trachelectomy isthmic and vaginal smear cytology.
Singh N; Titmuss E; Chin Aleong J; Sheaff MT; Curran G; Jacobs IJ; Shepherd JH
Cytopathology; 2004 Apr; 15(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 15056170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
