These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11241576)

  • 21. An order-directed score test for trend in ordered 2 X K tables.
    Liu Q
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1147-54. PubMed ID: 9750257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Power and sample size calculations for exact conditional tests with ordered categorical data.
    Hilton JF; Mehta CR
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):609-16. PubMed ID: 8369392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 18264992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Monte Carlo investigation of homogeneity tests of the odds ratio under various sample size configurations.
    Jones MP; O'Gorman TW; Lemke JH; Woolson RF
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 2720050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ; Lee ML
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 16542245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A method for comparing two normal means using combined samples of correlated and uncorrelated data.
    Looney SW; Jones PW
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1601-10. PubMed ID: 12704618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A note on the tests for clustered matched-pair binary data.
    Yang Z; Sun X; Hardin JW
    Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):638-52. PubMed ID: 20976694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.
    Qiu SF; Tang NS; Tang ML; Pei YB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):857-71. PubMed ID: 20183448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Power calculations for preclinical studies using a K-sample rank test and the Lehmann alternative hypothesis.
    Heller G
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2543-53. PubMed ID: 16025543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Power analyses for correlations from clustered study designs.
    Tu XM; Kowalski J; Crits-Christoph P; Gallop R
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2587-606. PubMed ID: 16025545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of selected nonparametric tests for discrete longitudinal data under different patterns of missing data.
    Chirwa TF; Bogaerts J; Chirwa ED; Kazembe LN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 19127475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-cluster designs.
    Donner A; Klar N; Zou G
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):919-25. PubMed ID: 15606412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
    Yang Y; Jin Z
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data.
    Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A modified Wilcoxon test for non-negative distributions with a clump of zeros.
    Hallstrom AP
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 19941301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incorporating correlation for multivariate failure time data when cluster size is large.
    Xue L; Wang L; Qu A
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 19673860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.