221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11242726)
1. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars.
Gross LC; Griffen AL; Casamassimo PS
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11242726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results.
Hse KM; Wei SH
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Aug; 128(8):1088-96. PubMed ID: 9260418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
Duggal MS; Toumba KJ; Sharma NK
Br Dent J; 2002 Sep; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; Folkesson UH; van Dijken JW
Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Aug; 55(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 9298168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.
Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars.
el-Kalla IH
Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10477997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months.
Welbury RR; Shaw AJ; Murray JJ; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10975160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
