These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11243428)

  • 21. Horizontal fusional amplitudes after adaptation to prism.
    Stephens GL; Jones R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 2330209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of monovision lenses on the near-point range of single binocular vision.
    McGill EC; Erickson P
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):828-31. PubMed ID: 1813510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of Induced Vertical Disparity on Horizontal Fusional Reserves.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Kundart J; Etezad-Razavi M; Askarizadeh F
    Strabismus; 2017 Dec; 25(4):195-199. PubMed ID: 29235886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurement of fusional vergence: a systematic review.
    Lança CC; Rowe FJ
    Strabismus; 2019 Jun; 27(2):88-113. PubMed ID: 30821611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of vergence adaptation and positive fusional vergence training on oculomotor parameters.
    Thiagarajan P; Lakshminarayanan V; Bobier WR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 87(7):487-93. PubMed ID: 20473234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bagolini glasses: do they affect the horizontal prism fusion amplitude?
    Schultinga L; Burggraaf F; Polling JR; Gutter M
    Strabismus; 2013 Jun; 21(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 23713936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of prolonged dissociation on the subjective measurement of near heterophoria.
    Rosenfield M; Chun TW; Fischer SE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Nov; 17(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 9666921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The intraexaminer and interexaminer repeatability of the alternate cover test using different prism neutralization endpoints.
    Johns HA; Manny RE; Fern K; Hu YS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):939-46. PubMed ID: 15592119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Interaction between Vergence and Accommodation Cues in the Assessment of Fusional Vergence Range.
    Argilés M; Cardona G
    Life (Basel); 2024 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 39337967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem?
    Gall R; Wick B
    Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Binocular vision measurements with a new online digital platform: comparison with conventional clinical measures.
    Mena-Guevara KJ; de Fez D; Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP
    Clin Exp Optom; 2024 Sep; 107(7):716-722. PubMed ID: 37944504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is the aligning prism measured with the Mallett unit correlated with fusional vergence reserves?
    Conway ML; Thomas J; Subramanian A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42832. PubMed ID: 22905174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Age on Binocular Vision Normative Values.
    Sánchez-González MC; Sánchez-González JM; De-Hita-Cantalejo C; Vega-Holm M; Jiménez-Rejano JJ; Gutiérrez-Sánchez E
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Nov; 57(6):363-371. PubMed ID: 33211893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Objective Measurement of Fusional Vergence Ranges and Heterophoria in Infants and Preschool Children.
    Sreenivasan V; Babinsky EE; Wu Y; Candy TR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 May; 57(6):2678-88. PubMed ID: 27183054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of step vergence method for assessing fusional vergence in intermittent exotropia.
    Ma MM; Kang Y; Scheiman M; Chen Q; Ye X; Chen X
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Jul; 42(4):913-920. PubMed ID: 35243666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fusional Amplitudes: Developing Testing Standards.
    Fray KJ
    Strabismus; 2017 Sep; 25(3):145-155. PubMed ID: 28759298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automaticity in fusional vergence therapy.
    Birnbaum MH
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Aug; 66(8):471-8. PubMed ID: 7494081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of fusional ranges measured by Risley prisms, vectograms, and computer orthopter.
    Feldman JM; Cooper J; Carniglia P; Schiff FM; Skeete JN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):375-82. PubMed ID: 2771323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Effect of Vertically Yoked Prisms on Binocular Vision and Accommodation.
    Schmid KL; Beavis SD; Wallace SI; Chen J; Chien YT; Nguyen T; Tran A; Varnas SR; Atchison DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):414-423. PubMed ID: 31107840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.