These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Objective estimation of fusional reserves using infrared eye tracking: the digital fusion-range test. Gao TY; Wong J; Zhou LW; Black J; Turnbull PR; Bex PJ; Dakin SC Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Sep; 106(7):769-776. PubMed ID: 36375141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Re-evaluation of the four prism diopter base-out test. Frantz KA; Cotter SA; Wick B Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Oct; 69(10):777-86. PubMed ID: 1436999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Vergence adaptation in children and its clinical significance. Wong LC; Rosenfield M; Wong NN Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2001; 16(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11240934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Resting positions of vergence and their relation to asthenopic complaints. Jaschinski W; Walper N Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 17523043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Binocular function changes produced in response to overnight orthokeratology. Felipe-Marquez G; Nombela-Palomo M; Palomo-Álvarez C; Cacho I; Nieto-Bona A Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 255(1):179-188. PubMed ID: 27873014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Vision profile of patients with mild brain injury. Hellerstein LF; Freed S; Maples WC J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Oct; 66(10):634-9. PubMed ID: 7499718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The prism that aligns fixation disparity does not predict the self-selected prism. Otto JM; Bach M; Kommerell G Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Nov; 28(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19076557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Three binocularity evaluation methods. Goodlaw E J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Sep; 53(9):707-11. PubMed ID: 7130610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Clear and Single Binocular Vision in Near 3D Displays. McCormack GL; Hogan KM Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):850-859. PubMed ID: 31688693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Heterophoria and fusional convergence and divergence in preschool children. Radaković M; Ivetić V; Naumović N; Canadanović V; Stankov B Med Glas (Zenica); 2012 Aug; 9(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 22926366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Tolerance to prism induced by readymade spectacles: setting and using a standard. du Toit R; Ramke J; Brian G Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Nov; 84(11):1053-9. PubMed ID: 18043425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Assessment of vergence facility in a sample of older adults with presbyopia. Pellizzer S; Siderov J Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Nov; 75(11):817-21. PubMed ID: 9848836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Latency of saccades, vergence, and combined movements in children with early onset convergent or divergent strabismus. Bucci MP; Kapoula Z; Yang Q; Brémond-Gignac D Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1384-92. PubMed ID: 16126244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reliability of binocular vision measurements used in the classification of convergence insufficiency. Rouse MW; Borsting E; Deland PN; Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 79(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 11999151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Vergence facility and target type. Gall R; Wick B; Bedell H Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Oct; 75(10):727-30. PubMed ID: 9798212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A normative study of step vergence in elementary schoolchildren. Scheiman M; Herzberg H; Frantz K; Margolies M J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Apr; 60(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 2723323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses. Jiang BC; Tea YC; O'Donnell D Optometry; 2007 Mar; 78(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 17321462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]