These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11243613)

  • 41. Quality and quantity of bone following alveolar distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible.
    Chiapasco M; Lang NP; Bosshardt DD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 16907770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors after mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Byun JH; Park BW; Kim JR; Lee JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 17250992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Tooth-borne distraction of the mandible. An experimental study.
    Niederhagen B; Braumann B; Schmolke C; Appel T; von Lindern JJ; Bergé S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 28(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 10609754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Maxillary distraction using a trans-sinusal distractor: technical note.
    Nadjmi V; Van Erum R; Schoenaers J; Schepers E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 14759118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sustained proliferation accompanies distraction osteogenesis in the rat.
    Aronson J; Shen XC; Gao GG; Miller F; Quattlebaum T; Skinner RA; Badger TM; Lumpkin CK
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Jul; 15(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 9379266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Distraction bone healing.
    Karaharju EO; Aalto K; Kahri A; Lindberg LA; Kallio T; Karaharju-Suvanto T; Vauhkonen M; Peltonen J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Dec; (297):38-43. PubMed ID: 8242947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Minimally invasive orthognathic surgery: endoscopic vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Troulis MJ; Nahlieli O; Castano F; Kaban LB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Aug; 29(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 11030392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Immunohistochemical and in-situ hybridization study of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha and angiopoietin-1 in a rabbit model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    He JF; Xie ZJ; Zhao H; Ge WL; Hu JA; Li YN; Gu ZY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 37(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 18339517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of chitosan bead encapsulating calcium sulfate as an injectable bone substitute on consolidation in the mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model.
    Cho BC; Chung HY; Lee DG; Yang JD; Park JW; Roh KH; Kim GU; Lee DS; Kwon IC; Bae EH; Jang KH; Park RW; Kim IS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1753-64. PubMed ID: 16297697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with newly designed electromechanical distractor.
    Aykan A; Ugurlutan R; Zor F; Ozturk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1519-23. PubMed ID: 24914755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
    Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vertical distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible: a prospective morphometric study.
    Amir LR; Becking AG; Jovanovic A; Perdijk FB; Everts V; Bronckers AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 16907773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Changes of masseter muscles after mandibular angle ostectomy in rhesus monkeys.
    Zhu S; Cui J; Gao Y; Zhang B; Hu J
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Dec; 63(6):670-5. PubMed ID: 19887934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Dental assisted distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Results of an animal experimental study and initial clinical application].
    Braumann B; Niederhagen B; Schmolke C; von Lindern JJ
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 Jan; 3(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 10077960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model.
    Troulis MJ; Glowacki J; Perrott DH; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 May; 58(5):507-13; discussion 514. PubMed ID: 10800906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction wound by computed tomography.
    Zimmermann CE; Harris G; Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Perrott DH; Rahn B; Kaban LB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 33(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 15308257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible.
    Thurmüller P; Troulis MJ; Rosenberg A; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1327-33. PubMed ID: 12420269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.
    Peacock ZS; Tricomi BJ; Faquin WC; Magill JC; Murphy BA; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):2320-4. PubMed ID: 26594967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of a semiburied, fixed-trajectory, curvilinear, distraction device in an animal model.
    Seldin EB; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 57(12):1442-6; discussion 1447-8. PubMed ID: 10596666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [A histomorphologic and enzyme histochemical study of masticatory muscles affected by distraction osteogenesis of mandible].
    Xiao W; Shang W; Li W
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Oct; 20(5):333-5. PubMed ID: 12607360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.