These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

41 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11244657)

  • 1. Reconstructed measurements produced from ultrasound images using a computerized system.
    Herman A; Abargel A; Maymon R; Dreazen E; Tovbin Y; Weinraub Z
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jan; 17(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 11244657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image magnification does not contribute to the repeatability of caliper placement in measuring nuchal translucency thickness.
    Herman A; Maymon R; Dreazen E; Caspi E; Bukovsky I; Weinraub Z
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 11(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 9618850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The importance of quality management in fetal measurement.
    Dudley NJ; Chapman E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 19(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 11876814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of image settings on nuchal translucency thickness measurement by a semi-automated system.
    Chen PW; Chen M; Leung TY; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 39(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 21732462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A score-based method for quality control of fetal images at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination.
    Salomon LJ; Winer N; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Sep; 28(9):822-7. PubMed ID: 18646244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning for capturing 3-dimensional data from a natural ear to aid rehabilitation.
    Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 16479767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements.
    Zalud I; Good S; Carneiro G; Georgescu B; Aoki K; Green L; Shahrestani F; Okumura R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jan; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19165678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What information on fetal anatomy can be provided by a single first-trimester transabdominal three-dimensional sweep?
    Fauchon DE; Benzie RJ; Wye DA; Cairns DR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 18307174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of facial soft tissue thickness measurements in personal computer-based multiplanar reconstructed computed tomographic images.
    Kim KD; Ruprecht A; Wang G; Lee JB; Dawson DV; Vannier MW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 16216709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control of an image-scoring method for nuchal translucency ultrasonography.
    Fries N; Althuser M; Fontanges M; Talmant C; Jouk PS; Tindel M; Duyme M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):272.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17346552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry.
    Perni SC; Chervenak FA; Kalish RB; Magherini-Rothe S; Predanic M; Streltzoff J; Skupski DW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15476300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing obstetric and gynecology ultrasound images by adaptation of the speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion filter.
    Munteanu C; Morales FC; Fernández JG; Rosa A; Déniz LG
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jul; 43(3):223-42. PubMed ID: 18499411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality of nuchal transluccency measurements: an exploratory study into their performance and evaluation].
    van den Berg M; Kleinveld JH; Sander MJ; van Vugt JM; Timmermans DR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jul; 149(30):1691-6. PubMed ID: 16104116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning for capturing 3-dimensional data from an object of standard form.
    Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):405-13. PubMed ID: 16220806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nuchal translucency thickness measurement: repeatability using a virtual ultrasound scanner.
    Newey VR; Nassiri DK; Bhide A; Thilaganathan B
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):596-601. PubMed ID: 12808678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic tissue characterization of the mouse myocardium: successful in vivo cyclic variation measurements.
    Kovacs A; Courtois MR; Weinheimer CJ; Posdamer SH; Wallace KD; Holland MR; Miller JG
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2004 Aug; 17(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 15282494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast sonography, video densitometry and intervillous blood flow: a pilot project.
    Barth WH; McCurnin DC; Dee Carey K; Hankins GD
    Placenta; 2006; 27(6-7):719-26. PubMed ID: 16157372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
    Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.