These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11246374)

  • 1. Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying pure moments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator.
    Wilke HJ; Rohlmann A; Neller S; Schultheiss M; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Claes LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 11246374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro fixator rod loading after transforaminal compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kettler A; Niemeyer T; Issler L; Merk U; Mahalingam M; Werner K; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 16442678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ISSLS prize winner: A novel approach to determine trunk muscle forces during flexion and extension: a comparison of data from an in vitro experiment and in vivo measurements.
    Wilke HJ; Rohlmann A; Neller S; Graichen F; Claes L; Bergmann G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(23):2585-93. PubMed ID: 14652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations of the cervical porcine spine in evaluating spinal implants in comparison with human cervical spinal segments: a biomechanical in vitro comparison of porcine and human cervical spine specimens with different instrumentation techniques.
    Schmidt R; Richter M; Claes L; Puhl W; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(11):1275-82. PubMed ID: 15928552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telemeterized load measurement using instrumented spinal internal fixators in a patient with degenerative instability.
    Rohlmann A; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Mayer HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Dec; 20(24):2683-9. PubMed ID: 8747246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system.
    Gédet P; Haschtmann D; Thistlethwaite PA; Ferguson SJ
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1504-11. PubMed ID: 19565278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of muscle forces on loads in internal spinal fixation devices.
    Rohlmann A; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Mayer HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(5):537-42. PubMed ID: 9530784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional stabilization provided by the external spinal fixator compared to two internal fixation devices: a biomechanical in vitro flexibility study.
    Lund T; Nydegger T; Rathonyi G; Nolte LP; Schlenzka D; Oxland TR
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Oct; 12(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 14618386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Schleicher P; Gerlach R; Schär B; Cain CM; Achatz W; Pflugmacher R; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1757-65. PubMed ID: 18841399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.
    Rohlmann A; Bauer L; Zander T; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 16549091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of loads on internal spinal fixation devices measured in vitro and in vivo.
    Rohlmann A; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Weber U
    Med Eng Phys; 1997 Sep; 19(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 9394902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical analysis of an instrumented spinal fixator under torsional loads.
    Alkalay RN; Sharpe D; Bader DL
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):865-76. PubMed ID: 15713308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a lumbar intervertebral spacer with integrated screws as a stand-alone fixation device.
    Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Turner JL; Castro CA; Armstrong WD; Waugh LG; Dryer RF
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 20084028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinematics and load-sharing of an anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction construct with PEEK rods: An in vitro biomechanical study.
    Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu X; Tong J; Ji W; Liu S; Zhu Q
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2016 Dec; 40():1-7. PubMed ID: 27756005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.