BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11246457)

  • 1. Power of variance component linkage analysis to detect quantitative trait loci.
    Williams JT; Blangero J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1999 Nov; 63(Pt 6):545-63. PubMed ID: 11246457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power of variance component linkage analysis-II. Discrete traits.
    Williams JT; Blangero J
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Nov; 68(Pt 6):620-32. PubMed ID: 15598220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees.
    Almasy L; Blangero J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 May; 62(5):1198-211. PubMed ID: 9545414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating Heritability from Nuclear Family and Pedigree Data.
    Bochud M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():195-210. PubMed ID: 28980247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A variance component approach to dichotomous trait linkage analysis using a threshold model.
    Duggirala R; Williams JT; Williams-Blangero S; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):987-92. PubMed ID: 9433612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quantitative LOD score: test statistic and sample size for exclusion and linkage of quantitative traits in human sibships.
    Page GP; Amos CI; Boerwinkle E
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Apr; 62(4):962-8. PubMed ID: 9529341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.
    Sham PC; Cherny SS; Purcell S; Hewitt JK
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1616-30. PubMed ID: 10762547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.
    Abecasis GR; Cookson WO; Cardon LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 11349228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of variance components and sibpair-based approaches to quantitative trait linkage analysis in unselected samples.
    Williams JT; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10030396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of genotype-by-sex interaction on quantitative trait linkage analysis.
    Towne B; Siervogel RM; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1053-8. PubMed ID: 9433623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Score test for mapping quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size when the dominance effect is not negligible.
    Wang K; Huang J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):398-412. PubMed ID: 12432506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci: sib pairs or sibships?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Hum Hered; 2000; 50(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 10782019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative trait locus analysis of hybrid pedigrees: variance-components model, inbreeding parameter, and power.
    Svischeva GR
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jul; 8():50. PubMed ID: 17651509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytic power calculation for QTL linkage analysis of small pedigrees.
    Rijsdijk FV; Hewitt JK; Sham PC
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 9(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 11378821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restricted maximum likelihood analysis of linkage between genetic markers and quantitative trait loci for a granddaughter design.
    Van Arendonk JA; Tier B; Bink MC; Bovenhuis H
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Sep; 81 Suppl 2():76-84. PubMed ID: 9777514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis of X-linked traits in general pedigrees.
    Song KK; Feingold E; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Jan; 70(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 11719901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees.
    Amos CI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Mar; 54(3):535-43. PubMed ID: 8116623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal selection of sib pairs from random samples for linkage analysis of a QTL using the EDAC test.
    Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 1998 May; 28(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 9670595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating heritability from nuclear family and pedigree data.
    Bochud M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():171-86. PubMed ID: 22307699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping quantitative trait loci with extreme discordant sib pairs: sampling considerations.
    Risch NJ; Zhang H
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):836-43. PubMed ID: 8644748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.