These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11246801)

  • 1. Design and validation of a high-flow personal sampler for PM2.5.
    Adams HS; Kenny LC; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Colvile RN; Gussman RA
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2001; 11(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11246801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK.
    Adams HS; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Colvile RN; McMullen MA; Khandelwal P
    Sci Total Environ; 2001 Nov; 279(1-3):29-44. PubMed ID: 11712603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a personal and microenvironmental aerosol speciation sampler (PMASS).
    Geyh AS; Hering S; Kreisberg N; John W
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Nov; (122):1-22; discussion 23-9. PubMed ID: 15675716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New experimental methods for the development and evaluation of aerosol samplers.
    Brixey LA; Paik SY; Evans DE; Vincent JH
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 12400907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field performance evaluation of a newly developed PM₂.₅ sampler at IIT Kanpur.
    Gupta T; Jaiprakash ; Dubey S
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Aug; 409(18):3500-7. PubMed ID: 21641629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the UNC Passive Aerosol Sampler Model Based on Comparison with Commonly Used Aerosol Sampling Methods.
    Shirdel M; Andersson BM; Bergdahl IA; Sommar JN; Wingfors H; Liljelind IE
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Mar; 62(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 29300818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and evaluation of a personal particulate organic and mass sampler.
    Pang Y; Gundel LA; Larson T; Finn D; Liu LJ; Claiborn CS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Dec; 36(23):5205-10. PubMed ID: 12523439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance characteristics of PM10 samplers under calm air conditions.
    Lai CY; Chen CC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Apr; 50(4):578-87. PubMed ID: 10786010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personal sampling of airborne particles: method performance and data quality.
    Janssen NA; Hoek G; Harssema H; Brunekreef B
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1998; 8(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 9470103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thoracic size-selective sampling of fibres: performance of four types of thoracic sampler in laboratory tests.
    Jones AD; Aitken RJ; Fabriès JF; Kauffer E; Liden G; Maynard A; Riediger G; Sahle W
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Aug; 49(6):481-92. PubMed ID: 15790615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.
    Lioy PJ; Fan Z; Zhang J; Georgopoulos P; Wang SW; Ohman-Strickland P; Wu X; Zhu X; Harrington J; Tang X; Meng Q; Jung KH; Kwon J; Hernandez M; Bonnano L; Held J; Neal J;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Aug; (160):3-127; discussion 129-51. PubMed ID: 22097188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of four gravimetric fine particle sampling methods.
    Yanosky JD; MacIntosh DL
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Jun; 51(6):878-84. PubMed ID: 11417679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and evaluation of an impactor for a PM2.5 speciation sampler.
    Demokritou P; Kavouras IG; Harrison D; Koutrakis P
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Apr; 51(4):514-23. PubMed ID: 11321908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the techniques and standards of particulate matter sampling.
    Patel P; Aggarwal SG
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Aug; 72(8):791-814. PubMed ID: 35254217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring personal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM
    Pillarisetti A; Carter E; Rajkumar S; Young BN; Benka-Coker ML; Peel JL; Johnson M; Clark ML
    Environ Int; 2019 Feb; 123():50-53. PubMed ID: 30496981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A personal particle speciation sampler.
    Hering S; Kreisberg N; John W
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2003 Feb; (114):1-27; discussion 29-34. PubMed ID: 12670062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and laboratory performance evaluation of a personal cascade impactor.
    Demokritou P; Gupta T; Ferguson S; Koutrakis P
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Oct; 52(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 12418733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.