111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11247203)
1. Pertinent points.
Black J
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 11247203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Meeting sexual dysfunction again for the first time.
Reamy KJ
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginismus is better not included in sexual pain disorder.
Ohkawa R
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 11247223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual dysfunction or pain disorder?: dyspareunia from the perspective of the harmful dysfunction analysis.
Wakefield JC
Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):52-7, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Penetration disorder: dyspareunia exists on the extension of vaginismus.
Kaneko K
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 11247214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dyspareunia: a pain disorder or sexual dysfunction?
Markos AR
Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):39-41, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Difficulties in the differential diagnosis of vaginismus, dyspareunia and mixed sexual pain disorder.
van Lankveld JJ; Brewaeys AM; Ter Kuile MM; Weijenborg PT
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Dec; 16(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 8748995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revisiting the diagnosis of dyspareunia: a painful but important discussion.
Masheb R; Richman S
Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):41-2, 57-61; author reply 63-7. PubMed ID: 16092027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Female sexual function and dysfunction: can the Cinderella of medicine turn into a princess?
Graziottin A
Climacteric; 2001 Mar; 4(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 11379376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Should dyspareunia be retained as a sexual dysfunction in DSM-V? A painful classification decision.
Binik YM
Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 15772767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Another procrustean bed for female sexual functioning.
Shaw J
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 11247229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conceptualizing women's sexual problems.
Bancroft J; Graham CA; McCord C
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 11247236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer commentaries on Binik (2005).
Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Feb; 34(1):23-61. PubMed ID: 15772768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New classification on female sexual dysfunction: some reflections on the consensus report.
Slowinski J
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 11247231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Strategic planning in research and development is needed in female sexual dysfunction.
Shabsigh R
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):209-10. PubMed ID: 11247228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The "consensus" conference on female sexual dysfunction: conflicts of interest and hidden agendas.
Tiefer L
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 11247233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New diagnostic categories for female sexual dysfunction: does the falling tree make a sound if no one is there to hear it?
Plaut SM
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 11247224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding female sexual dysfunction and the consensus conference: this is progress?
Maurice WL
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 11247218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification of sexual dysfunctions in women.
Vroege JA; Gijs L; Hengeveld MW
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 11247234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are we ready for this classification system?
O'Donohue W; Geer JH
J Sex Marital Ther; 2001; 27(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 11247222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
