These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11247244)

  • 1. [Cochlear implantation with implant Combi 40+ produced by MED-El].
    Ovchinnikov IuM; Borodin AA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2001; (1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11247244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory performance of cochlear implant children aged 2-5 years.
    Thawin C; Kanchanalarp C; Lertsukprasert K; Cheewaruangroj W; Khantapasuantara K; Ruencharoen S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Nov; 89(11):1923-7. PubMed ID: 17205875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term data on children implanted with a short electrode array.
    Anderson I; Pitterl M; Skarzynski H; Evans R; Godey B; Sainz MQ; D'Haese PS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Feb; 69(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15656948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MED-EL Combi40+ cochlear implantation in adults.
    Bassim MK; Buss E; Clark MS; Kolln KA; Pillsbury CH; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Sep; 115(9):1568-73. PubMed ID: 16148696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):934-40. PubMed ID: 16864490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Objective methods of fitting speech processors of cochlear implants Combi-40/40+ and Tempo+: impedance technique].
    Petrov SM; Shchukina AA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2007; (5):20-2. PubMed ID: 18163073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implantation at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a 12-year experience.
    Al-Muhaimeed HS; Al-Anazy F; Attallah MS; Hamed O
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Nov; 123(11):e20. PubMed ID: 19775492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear Implantation in Brown-Vialetto-Van-Laere syndrome.
    Sinnathuray AR; Watson DR; Fruhstorfer B; Olarte JR; Toner JG
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Mar; 125(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 20955635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Articulation skills in Turkish speaking children with cochlear implant.
    Sevinc S; Ozcebe E; Atas A; Buyukozturk S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Oct; 73(10):1430-3. PubMed ID: 19695717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation.
    Di Nardo W; Cantore I; Cianfrone F; Melillo P; Rigante M; Paludetti G
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17259703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tone recognition and electrode discrimination in prelingually deafened cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei CG; Cao KL; Chen XW; Jin X; Zheng ZY; Zeng FG
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 15195586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone island tunnel for cochlear and vibrant soundbridge implantation.
    Foyt D; Steiniger E; Rende S
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Aug; 117(8):1395-6. PubMed ID: 17597632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf children before 2 years of age when compared with later implantation.
    Manrique M; Cervera-Paz FJ; Huarte A; Molina M
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1462-9. PubMed ID: 15280727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.