250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11247696)
1. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power Doppler sonography of metastatic nodes from papillary carcinoma of the thyroid.
Ahuja AT; Ying M; Yuen HY; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 11286579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Power Doppler sonography to differentiate tuberculous cervical lymphadenopathy from nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Ahuja A; Ying M; Yuen YH; Metreweli C
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2001 Apr; 22(4):735-40. PubMed ID: 11290489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of Doppler spectral analysis and power Doppler sonography in the differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathies.
Wu CH; Chang YL; Hsu WC; Ko JY; Sheen TS; Hsieh FJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):503-9. PubMed ID: 9694484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Power Doppler sonography of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Ahuja A; Ying M; Yuen YH; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2001 Dec; 56(12):965-9. PubMed ID: 11795924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Differential diagnosis in cervical lymphadenopathies: efficacy of B-mode, color and power Doppler ultrasonography].
Ayata Z; Apaydin M; Varer M; Sarsilmaz A; Calli C; Rezanko T
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 19860630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Distinguishing Different Causes of Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Cheng SC; Ahuja AT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):2010-6. PubMed ID: 27131839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of sonographic vascular features in differentiating different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Ahuja A; Brook F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 15121245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture.
Tschammler A; Ott G; Schang T; Seelbach-Goebel B; Schwager K; Hahn D
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 9646801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Subjective Grading and Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Differentiating Metastatic and Reactive Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
Lam J; Ying M; Cheung SY; Yeung KH; Yu PH; Cheng HC; Ahuja AT
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 25140495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound.
Wu CH; Hsu MM; Chang YL; Hsieh FJ
Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 9740085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Dangore SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cervical lymph node vascularity: a comparison of colour Doppler, power Doppler and 3-D power Doppler sonography.
Ahuja AT; Ying M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 30(12):1557-64. PubMed ID: 15617828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.
Yang WT; Chang J; Metreweli C
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):568-73. PubMed ID: 10796941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of Doppler waveform analysis in differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Brnić Z; Hebrang A
Eur Radiol; 2003 Jan; 13(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 12541127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Differentiation of abdominal lymphadenoptahy with power Doppler sonography].
Neumann-Silkow H; Görg C
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 20084598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
