BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11249086)

  • 1. Comparison of correlated receiver operating characteristic curves derived from repeated diagnostic test data.
    Zou KH
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 11249086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive power of irregular border shapes for malignant melanomas.
    Lee TK; Claridge E
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15691253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new method describing border irregularity of pigmented lesions.
    Zhou Y; Smith M; Smith L; Warr R
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 20384885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using 3D differential forms to characterize a pigmented lesion in vivo.
    Zhou Y; Smith M; Smith L; Warr R
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 20384886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
    Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dermatoscopic ABCD rule and risk stratification in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma.
    Lorentzen H; Weismann K; Kenet RO; Secher L; Larsen FG
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2000; 80(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 10877133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian semiparametric ROC curve estimation and disease diagnosis.
    Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Hanson TE; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2474-96. PubMed ID: 18300333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.
    Du P; Tang L
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [ROC-curve analysis. A statistical method for the evaluation of diagnostic tests].
    Albeck MJ; Børgesen SE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jun; 152(23):1650-3. PubMed ID: 2194326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
    Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The performance of SolarScan: an automated dermoscopy image analysis instrument for the diagnosis of primary melanoma.
    Menzies SW; Bischof L; Talbot H; Gutenev A; Avramidis M; Wong L; Lo SK; Mackellar G; Skladnev V; McCarthy W; Kelly J; Cranney B; Lye P; Rabinovitz H; Oliviero M; Blum A; Varol A; De'Ambrosis B; McCleod R; Koga H; Grin C; Braun R; Johr R
    Arch Dermatol; 2005 Nov; 141(11):1388-96. PubMed ID: 16301386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple digital image processing system to aid in melanoma diagnosis in an everyday melanocytic skin lesion unit: a preliminary report.
    Manousaki AG; Manios AG; Tsompanaki EI; Panayiotides JG; Tsiftsis DD; Kostaki AK; Tosca AD
    Int J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16650167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semiparametric ROC surfaces for continuous diagnostic tests based on two test measurements.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2370-83. PubMed ID: 19499550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.