These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11249346)

  • 1. Why do they complain about nurses?
    Walker D
    Nurs BC; 2000 Jun; 32(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 11249346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Professional conduct review process.
    Nurs BC; 2007 Apr; 39(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 17477183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses face tougher regulation.
    Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 25-31; 102(30):11. PubMed ID: 16903296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facing a competence review.
    Cook P
    Nurs N Z; 2009 Sep; 15(8):26. PubMed ID: 19891142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protecting the public through the regulation of registered nurses.
    Irving K
    Nurs BC; 2007 Jun; 39(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 17624043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Just do it.
    Knape J
    Nurs Times; 2001 Nov 8-14; 97(45):24. PubMed ID: 11966140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Out with the old, in with the new.
    Duffin C
    Nurs Stand; 2000 Jun 14-20; 14(39):12-3. PubMed ID: 11974312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient care hangs in the balance.
    Brunke L
    Nurs BC; 2000 Jun; 32(3):38. PubMed ID: 11249347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The UKCC's Code of Professional Conduct.
    Norman A
    Nurs Times; 1998 Dec 9-15; 94(49):21. PubMed ID: 10036530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A commitment to public protection.
    Brunke L
    Nurs BC; 2004 Jun; 36(3):38, 36-7. PubMed ID: 15301081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Health Care Complaints Commission and nurses.
    Cohen S
    Lamp; 1998 Mar; 55(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 10025314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The performance of doctors: the new professionalism.
    Irvine D
    Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9159):1174-7. PubMed ID: 10209996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concept analysis: malpractice and modern-day nursing practice.
    Weld KK; Garmon Bibb SC
    Nurs Forum; 2009; 44(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 19187048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing times.
    Hall W
    Nurs Stand; 1995 Aug 9-15; 9(46):45. PubMed ID: 7646980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuing competence for nurse practitioners.
    Nurs BC; 2008 Feb; 40(1):19. PubMed ID: 18314759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing competency: a tale of two professions.
    Trunkey DD; Botney R
    J Am Coll Surg; 2001 Mar; 192(3):385-95. PubMed ID: 11245381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CRNBC 2007 Nursing Excellence Awards.
    Nurs BC; 2007 Jun; 39(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 17624045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is the standard of care for nurses?
    Shaw D
    Okla Nurse; 2006; 51(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 16737114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of the 1979 Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act.
    Nurs Times; 1997 Dec 3-9; 93(49):3. PubMed ID: 9429484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification.
    Lipner RS; Blank LL; Leas BF; Fortna GS
    Acad Med; 2002 Oct; 77(10 Suppl):S64-6. PubMed ID: 12377708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.