329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11250637)
1. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose reduction of intraoral dental radiography in Spain.
Alcaraz M; Navarro C; Vicente V; Canteras M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 16798929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
Fauber TL
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A quality assurance program in dental radiographic units in western Greece.
Stavrianou K; Pappous G; Pallikarakis N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 May; 99(5):622-7. PubMed ID: 15829888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Dose and image quality in intraoral radiography].
Hjardemaal O
Tandlaegebladet; 1991 Nov; 95(16):748-51. PubMed ID: 1816648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations.
Seo D; Jang S; Kim J; Kim J; Sung D; Kim H; Yoon Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23887271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the direct magnification technique in dental radiology.
Wichmann MG; von Brenndorff AI
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 10455390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose optimization for different medical imaging tasks from exposure index, exposure control factor, and MAS in digital radiography.
Zhang M; Zhao B; Wang Y; Chen W; Hou L
Health Phys; 2012 Sep; 103(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 22850227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
