330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11250637)
21. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF
N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Perceived quality of radiographic images after rapid processing of D- and F-speed direct-exposure intraoral x-ray films.
Bernstein DI; Clark SJ; Scheetz JP; Farman AG; Rosenson B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 14561976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiation protection in dental X-ray surgeries--still rooms for improvement.
Hart G; Dugdale M
Br Dent J; 2013 Mar; 214(6):E16. PubMed ID: 23519002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Radiation protection and quality assurance in dental radiography. A treatise from the European Community].
van der Stelt PF
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 9289750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiation dose-reduction techniques in North American dental schools.
Geist JR; Katz JO
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Apr; 93(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 12029291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is digital better in dental radiography?
Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Increasing source-to-image distance to reduce radiation dose from digital radiography pelvic examinations.
England A; Evans P; Harding L; Taylor EM; Charnock P; Williams G
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25739106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
