These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11250637)

  • 41. Patient radiation dose management in dental facilities according to the X-ray focal distance and the image receptor type.
    Gonzalez L; Moro J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):282-4. PubMed ID: 17586855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection.
    Jacobs R; Vanderstappen M; Bogaerts R; Gijbels F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 15585812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An investigation into techniques for reducing doses from neo-natal radiographic examinations.
    Wraith CM; Martin CJ; Stockdale EJ; McDonald S; Farquhar B
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Oct; 68(814):1074-82. PubMed ID: 7496707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
    Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
    Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A quantitative analysis of dental radiography quality assurance practices among North Carolina dentists.
    Platin E; Janhom A; Tyndall D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jul; 86(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 9690256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Diagnostic image quality and dose reduction using niobium filtration for cephalometric radiography.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 8181645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Digital pelvic radiography: increasing distance to reduce dose.
    Heath R; England A; Ward A; Charnock P; Ward M; Evans P; Harding L
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 83(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 21908777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lonizing radiation regulations and the dental practitioner: 3. Quality assurance in dental radiography.
    Rout J; Brown J
    Dent Update; 2012 Jun; 39(5):334-6, 338-9. PubMed ID: 22852511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Survey of dental radiographical practice in states of Punjab and Haryana in India.
    Sheikh S; Pallagatti S; Singla I; Gupta R; Aggarwal A; Singh R; Gupta D
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Feb; 5(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 23233351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Survey of dental radiological practice in Turkey.
    Ilgüy D; Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Bayirli G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 15961596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality control and diagnostic reference levels in intraoral dental radiographic facilities.
    Hatziioannou K; Psarouli E; Papanastassiou E; Bousbouras P; Kodona H; Kimoundri O; Delichas M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Sep; 34(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 16120881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Radiographic trends of dental offices and dental schools.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; Conway B; Hart JC; Boyce PR; Antonsen RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 130(7):1104-10. PubMed ID: 10422407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
    Wenman A; Lockwood P
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of developer depletion on image quality of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15314003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice.
    van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Oct; 136(10):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16255462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.
    Lanhede B; Båth M; Kheddache S; Sund P; Björneld L; Widell M; Almén A; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Panzer W; Zankl M; Månsson LG
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):38-49. PubMed ID: 11806957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessment of image quality and exposure parameters of an intraoral portable X-rays device.
    Zenóbio EG; Zenóbio MA; Azevedo CD; Nogueira MDS; Almeida CD; Manzi FR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180329. PubMed ID: 30426762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A study of the effects of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets on radiographic image quality.
    Araki K; Kanda S; Toyofuku F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 8181643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.