234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11251497)
1. Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial.
Biró MA; Waldenström U; Pannifex JH
Birth; 2000 Sep; 27(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 11251497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Satisfaction with team midwifery care for low- and high-risk women: a randomized controlled trial.
Biró MA; Waldenström U; Brown S; Pannifex JH
Birth; 2003 Mar; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12581034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.
Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Briley AL; Bollard M; Coxon K; Cross P; Silverio SA; Singh C; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Farrell T; Gold L; Biro MA; Albers L; Flood M; Oats J; Waldenström U
BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1483-92. PubMed ID: 22830446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services.
Waldenström U; Turnbull D
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Nov; 105(11):1160-70. PubMed ID: 9853764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. POPPIE: protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial of continuity of midwifery care for women at increased risk of preterm birth.
Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Bollard M; Brigante L; Briley A; Coxon K; Cross P; Healey A; Mehta M; Melaugh A; Moulla J; Seed PT; Shennan AH; Singh C; Tribe RM; Sandall J
Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):271. PubMed ID: 31088505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does team midwife care increase satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care? A randomized controlled trial.
Waldenström U; Brown S; McLachlan H; Forster D; Brennecke S
Birth; 2000 Sep; 27(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 11251496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Stockholm birth centre trial: maternal and infant outcome.
Waldenström U; Nilsson CA; Winbladh B
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Apr; 104(4):410-8. PubMed ID: 9141576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reforming maternity services in Australia: Outcomes of a private practice midwifery service.
Wilkes E; Gamble J; Adam G; Creedy DK
Midwifery; 2015 Oct; 31(10):935-40. PubMed ID: 26092305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: a randomised trial.
Rowley MJ; Hensley MJ; Brinsmead MW; Wlodarczyk JH
Med J Aust; 1995 Sep; 163(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 7565233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect on mortality of community-based maternity-care programme in rural Bangladesh.
Fauveau V; Stewart K; Khan SA; Chakraborty J
Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8776):1183-6. PubMed ID: 1682600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuity of midwifery care for rural women through caseload group practice: Delivering for almost 20 years.
Haines HM; Baker J; Marshall D
Aust J Rural Health; 2015 Dec; 23(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 26683716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an Australian Aboriginal model of maternity care: The Malabar Community Midwifery Link Service.
Hartz DL; Blain J; Caplice S; Allende T; Anderson S; Hall B; McGrath L; Williams K; Jarman H; Tracy SK
Women Birth; 2019 Oct; 32(5):427-436. PubMed ID: 31326382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial.
McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Lumley J; Farrell T; Oats J; Gold L; Waldenström U; Albers L; Biro MA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Aug; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18680606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical interventions and outcomes of One-to-One midwifery practice.
Page L; McCourt C; Beake S; Vail A; Hewison J
J Public Health Med; 1999 Sep; 21(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 10528949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Narrowing the Gap? Describing women's outcomes in Midwifery Group Practice in remote Australia.
Lack BM; Smith RM; Arundell MJ; Homer CS
Women Birth; 2016 Oct; 29(5):465-470. PubMed ID: 27050200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study.
Jepsen I; Juul S; Foureur MJ; Sørensen EE; Nohr EA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Dec; 18(1):481. PubMed ID: 30522453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
