These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11251511)

  • 1. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature.
    Gamble JA; Creedy DK
    Birth; 2000 Dec; 27(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 11251511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.
    Gamble J; Creedy DK; McCourt C; Weaver J; Beake S
    Birth; 2007 Dec; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 18021149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review of nulliparous women's views of planned cesarean birth: the missing component in the debate about a term cephalic trial.
    Kingdon C; Baker L; Lavender T
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 16948723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature.
    McCourt C; Weaver J; Statham H; Beake S; Gamble J; Creedy DK
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 17324181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors.
    Gamble JA; Creedy DK
    Birth; 2001 Jun; 28(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 11380381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's involvement with the decision preceding their caesarean section and their degree of satisfaction.
    Mould TA; Chong S; Spencer JA; Gallivan S
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Nov; 103(11):1074-7. PubMed ID: 8916991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Women's views on elective primary caesarean section.
    Pakenham S; Chamberlain SM; Smith GN
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 17169232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.
    Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches.
    Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature.
    O'Donovan C; O'Donovan J
    Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 29105822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
    Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of women's request and preference on the rising rate of caesarean section - a comparison of reviews.
    Panda S; Begley C; Daly D
    Midwifery; 2020 Sep; 88():102765. PubMed ID: 32531664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories.
    Munro S; Kornelsen J; Hutton E
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):373-379. PubMed ID: 19720338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are there "unnecessary" cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications.
    Weaver JJ; Statham H; Richards M
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17324176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section.
    Graham WJ; Hundley V; McCheyne AL; Hall MH; Gurney E; Milne J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 106(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10426639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal request for cesarian birth without medical indication in a group of healthy women: A qualitative study in Jordan.
    Hatamleh R; Abujilban S; Al-Shraideh AJ; Abuhammad S
    Midwifery; 2019 Dec; 79():102543. PubMed ID: 31648124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view.
    Vercellini P; Fumagalli M; Consonni D; de Braud L; Barbara G; Iurlaro E; Mosca F; Fedele L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1235-44. PubMed ID: 26248808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary nonmedically indicated cesarean section ("section on request"): evidence based or modern vogue?
    Grisaru S; Samueloff A
    Clin Perinatol; 2004 Sep; 31(3):409-30, vii. PubMed ID: 15325529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cesarean section on request in a developing country.
    Chigbu CO; Ezeome IV; Iloabachie GC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Jan; 96(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 17187800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.