271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11251944)
1. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Suba EJ; Nguyen CH; Nguyen BD; Raab SS;
Cancer; 2001 Mar; 91(5):928-39. PubMed ID: 11251944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Levin CE; Sellors JW
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2312-4; author reply 2314-6. PubMed ID: 12001136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in Australia: what is the impact of screening at different intervals or over a different age range?
Anderson R; Haas M; Shanahan M
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 32(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 18290913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries.
Goldie SJ; Gaffikin L; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Gordillo-Tobar A; Levin C; Mahé C; Wright TC;
N Engl J Med; 2005 Nov; 353(20):2158-68. PubMed ID: 16291985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cost effectiveness of human papilloma virus testing in cervical cancer screening: a literature review].
Mejía A; Salas W
Biomedica; 2008 Mar; 28(1):160-72. PubMed ID: 18645671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer prevention for all the world's women: genuine promise resides in skilled quality management rather than novel screening approaches.
Suba EJ; Donnelly AD; Furia LM; Huynh ML; Raab SS;
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Mar; 35(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 17304532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests.
Kulasingam SL; Myers ER; Lawson HW; McConnell KJ; Kerlikowske K; Melnikow J; Washington AE; Sawaya GF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):321-8. PubMed ID: 16449119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Perovic S
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Hungary.
Vokó Z; Nagyjánosi L; Margitai B; Kövi R; Tóth Z; László D; Kaló Z
Value Health; 2012 Jan; 15(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22264970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening strategies in Tunisia].
Hsaïri M; Fakhfakh R; Ghyoula M; Ben Abdallah M; Achour N
Tunis Med; 2000 Oct; 78(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 11190738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
Reust CE
J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The health and economic impact of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.
Wong G; Howard K; Webster A; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Transplantation; 2009 Apr; 87(7):1078-91. PubMed ID: 19352131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative cost effectiveness analysis of ThinPrep in the Australian setting.
Neville AM; Quinn MA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 45(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 16029294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening.
Bidus MA; Maxwell GL; Kulasingam S; Rose GS; Elkas JC; Chernofsky M; Myers ER
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 107(5):997-1005. PubMed ID: 16648402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase screening in HMO women overdue for Pap test and mammography services.
Lynch FL; Whitlock EP; Valanis BG; Smith SK
Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 38(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 15020173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
