324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11252223)
1. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: the cholesterol education and research trial (CEART).
Parker DR; Evangelou E; Eaton CB
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 15837446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction.
Murphy AW; Esterman A; Pilotto LS
Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 16945880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported.
Campbell MK; Grimshaw JM; Elbourne DR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Apr; 4():9. PubMed ID: 15115554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability, effect size, and responsiveness of health status measures in the design of randomized and cluster-randomized trials.
Diehr P; Chen L; Patrick D; Feng Z; Yasui Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15837452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving prevention in primary care: evaluating the effectiveness of outreach facilitation.
Hogg W; Lemelin J; Graham ID; Grimshaw J; Martin C; Moore L; Soto E; O'Rourke K
Fam Pract; 2008 Feb; 25(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 18209107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.
Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA; Stedman M; Avorn J; Solomon DH
Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. PubMed ID: 17909381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
Flynn TN; Peters TJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mounting a community-randomized trial: sample size, matching, selection, and randomization issues in PRISM.
Watson L; Small R; Brown S; Dawson W; Lumley J
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Jun; 25(3):235-50. PubMed ID: 15157727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of breastfeeding support provided by trained clinicians during an early, routine, preventive visit: a prospective, randomized, open trial of 226 mother-infant pairs.
Labarere J; Gelbert-Baudino N; Ayral AS; Duc C; Berchotteau M; Bouchon N; Schelstraete C; Vittoz JP; Francois P; Pons JC
Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e139-46. PubMed ID: 15687421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
Lewsey JD
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.
Lake S; Kammann E; Klar N; Betensky R
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1337-50. PubMed ID: 12185888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials in cancer: a review of current practices.
Murray DM; Pals SL; Blitstein JL; Alfano CM; Lehman J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):483-91. PubMed ID: 18364501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 'number needed to sample' in primary care research. Comparison of two primary care sampling frames for chronic back pain.
Smith BH; Hannaford PC; Elliott AM; Smith WC; Chambers WA
Fam Pract; 2005 Apr; 22(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 15722397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intracluster correlation adjustments to maintain power in cluster trials for binary outcomes.
Chakraborty H; Moore J; Hartwell TD
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 19386285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
