269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11252592)
1. Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests.
Dendukuri N; Joseph L
Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 11252592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard.
Black MA; Craig BA
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2653-69. PubMed ID: 12228883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard.
Joseph L; Gyorkos TW; Coupal L
Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Feb; 141(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 7840100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian sample-size determination for inference on two binomial populations with no gold standard classifier.
Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):2963-76. PubMed ID: 16007574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.
Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian sample size for diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard: Comparing identifiable with non-identifiable models.
Dendukuri N; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(26):2688-97. PubMed ID: 20803558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling conditional dependence among multiple diagnostic tests.
Wang Z; Dendukuri N; Zar HJ; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4843-4859. PubMed ID: 28875512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inference on cancer screening exam accuracy using population-level administrative data.
Jiang H; Brown PE; Walter SD
Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):130-46. PubMed ID: 26278587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Bayesian semiparametric approach to correlated ROC surfaces with stochastic order constraints.
Chen Z; Hwang BS
Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30390405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
Xu H; Craig BA
Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1145-55. PubMed ID: 19210729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: a multiple latent variable model.
Dendukuri N; Hadgu A; Wang L
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):441-61. PubMed ID: 19067379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bayesian approach to model the conditional correlation between several diagnostic tests and various replicated subjects measurements.
Pereira da Silva HD; Ascaso C; Gonçalves AQ; Orlandi PP; Abellana R
Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3154-3170. PubMed ID: 28543307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The utility of prior information and stratification for parameter estimation with two screening tests but no gold standard.
Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1203-17. PubMed ID: 15558709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian inference for kappa from single and multiple studies.
Basu S; Banerjee M; Sen A
Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):577-82. PubMed ID: 10877319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Two Bayesian Methods in Evaluation of the Absence of the Gold Standard Diagnostic Tests.
Li T; Liu P
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():1374748. PubMed ID: 31531344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian inference for recurrent events data using time-dependent frailty.
Manda SO; Meyer R
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1263-74. PubMed ID: 15568192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible Bayesian quantile regression for independent and clustered data.
Reich BJ; Bondell HD; Wang HJ
Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):337-52. PubMed ID: 19948746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
