BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11253141)

  • 21. Differing Interpretations of Report Terminology Between Primary Care Physicians and Radiologists.
    Gunn AJ; Tuttle MC; Flores EJ; Mangano MD; Bennett SE; Sahani DV; Choy G; Boland GW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1525-1529.e1. PubMed ID: 27595196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Pseudolymphoma of the skin: ambiguous terminology: a survey among dermatologists and pathologists].
    Levy E; Godet J; Cribier B; Lipsker D
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2013 Feb; 140(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 23395491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Notification of tuberculosis: a code of practice for England and Wales. Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Association.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 May; 284(6327):1454-6. PubMed ID: 6805565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can cancer registry data be used to study cancer treatment?
    Warren JL; Harlan LC
    Med Care; 2003 Sep; 41(9):1003-5. PubMed ID: 12972839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports.
    Plumb AA; Grieve FM; Khan SH
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Apr; 64(4):386-94; 395-6. PubMed ID: 19264183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative study of ovarian cancer histopathology by registry pathologists and referral pathologists: a study by the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry.
    Piver MS; Tsukada Y; Werness BA; DiCioccio RA; Whittemore AS; Ponder BA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 10926797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists.
    Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How do cancer registries in europe estimate completeness of registration?
    Schmidtmann I; Blettner M
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 19387506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The bristol registry of bone dysplasias: the first 10 years.
    Gordon IR; David TJ
    J Med Genet; 1981 Aug; 18(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 7277417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Practice guidelines for autopsy pathology. Autopsy reporting. Autopsy Committee of the College of American Pathologists.
    Hutchins GM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7848058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiology Reports: What YOU Think You're Saying and What THEY Think You're Saying.
    Lee B; Whitehead MT
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2017; 46(3):186-195. PubMed ID: 28069356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Information content in Medline record fields.
    Kostoff RN; Block JA; Stump JA; Pfeil KM
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Jun; 73(6):515-27. PubMed ID: 15171980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do we provide meaningful guidance for healthful eating? An investigation into consumers' interpretation of frequency consumption terms.
    King L; Watson WL; Chapman K; Kelly B; Louie JC; Hughes C; Crawford J; Gill TP
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2012; 44(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 22591579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The rationale for standardized registration and reporting of brain and central nervous system tumors in population-based cancer registries.
    Davis FG; Bruner JM; Surawicz TS
    Neuroepidemiology; 1997; 16(6):308-16. PubMed ID: 9430131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Raising the bar: speaking your customer's language.
    Webb M
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(4):165. PubMed ID: 21688749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On socioeconomic gradients in cancer registry data quality.
    Boscoe FP; Sherman C
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Jun; 60(6):551. PubMed ID: 16698989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Linking data from hospital and cancer registry databases: should this be standard practice?
    Field K; Kosmider S; Johns J; Farrugia H; Hastie I; Croxford M; Chapman M; Harold M; Murigu N; Gibbs P
    Intern Med J; 2010 Aug; 40(8):566-73. PubMed ID: 19460066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Completeness of the cancer registry].
    Berkel J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Oct; 133(41):2027-30. PubMed ID: 2797322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Terminology used by pathologists in reporting on sudden infant deaths.
    Limerick SR; Bacon CJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2004 Mar; 57(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 14990606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Definition of a SNOMED CT pathology subset and microglossary, based on 1.17 million biological samples from the Catalan Pathology Registry.
    Sanz X; Pareja L; Rius A; Rodenas P; Abdón N; Gálvez J; Esteban L; Escribà JM; Borràs JM; Ribes J
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Feb; 78():167-176. PubMed ID: 29158204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.