These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11253521)
1. [A validated finite element model of the human spine--description of the model and initial application]. Pitzen T; Matthis D; Steudel WI Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2001; 139(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11253521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine. Wheeldon JA; Pintar FA; Knowles S; Yoganandan N J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 16321642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effect of spongiosa density on load bearing of the lumbar spine.A finite element analysis]. Pitzen T; Matthis D; Müller-Storz H; Ritz R; Caspar W; Steudel WI Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 10730358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Finite element study on anterior transpedicular screw-artificial vertebral body fixation in lower cervical spine]. Wu W; Sun P; Liu X; Chen C; Wu C; Ouyang J Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1466-70. PubMed ID: 24640367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study. Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine. Imajo Y; Hiiragi I; Kato Y; Taguchi T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E83-7. PubMed ID: 19139658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Is the prediction of initial stability of cervical spinal osteo-synthesis possible using a finite element model?]. Pitzen T; Pedersen K; Matthis D; Müller-Storz H; Steudel WI Zentralbl Neurochir; 2000; 61(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 11189883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy. Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system. Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a finite element model of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex under physiologic loads. Zhang H; Bai J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):968-74. PubMed ID: 17450071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model. Whyne CM; Hu SS; Lotz JC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):652-60. PubMed ID: 12671351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics. Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]