These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11253980)

  • 1. Bush boosts research funds despite general austerity.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 2001 Mar; 357(9258):779. PubMed ID: 11253980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bush goes to war as budget boosts R&D.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6872):564. PubMed ID: 11832897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. science and austerity. Darwinism vs. social engineering at NIH.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6057):753-4. PubMed ID: 22076357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bush and Gore: a shared enthusiasm for medical research.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 2000 Oct; 356(9237):1251. PubMed ID: 11072957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NIH retains research funds for the future.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6606):203. PubMed ID: 8918864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 2002 spending. First Bush budget may put science on diet.
    Malakoff D; Mervis J
    Science; 2001 Feb; 291(5508):1463-4. PubMed ID: 11234058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Funds are key to sequence success.
    Young P
    Nature; 1995 Dec; 378(6558):655. PubMed ID: 7501002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. budget. Budgets in brief.
    Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1275. PubMed ID: 19264989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US health bodies reap funds for bioterrorism.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9308):771. PubMed ID: 11888599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First Bush budget set to favour life sciences.
    Davis M
    Nature; 2001 Feb; 409(6823):969. PubMed ID: 11234034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Senator seeks reassurance on NIH budget.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6715):94. PubMed ID: 9923666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH: in line with expectations.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1995 Feb; 373(6514):461. PubMed ID: 7845447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Senate bills back huge increases.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5300):608. PubMed ID: 9019814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH budget. Senate panel adds 16% to complete doubling.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5581):493. PubMed ID: 12142502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Congress: biomedical research wins big.
    Marshall E; Lawler A
    Science; 1996 Oct; 274(5284):27-8. PubMed ID: 8848718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When Federal science stopped.
    Mervis J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jan; 271(5246):136-7. PubMed ID: 8539608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Republicans seek freeze on health research.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6579):177. PubMed ID: 8622745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A shot in the arm for clinical research.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomedical research in the USA: at the dawn of a golden age?
    Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10013):1. PubMed ID: 26766330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NIH loses long-standing protection from impact of heavy budget cuts.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1995 May; 375(6528):168. PubMed ID: 7746302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.