These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11255928)

  • 21. Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy II: economic complements.
    Madden GJ; Smethells JR; Ewan EE; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Nov; 88(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 18047226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics of Alcohol Use Disorders.
    MacKillop J
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2016 Apr; 40(4):672-85. PubMed ID: 26993151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The behavioral economics of drug dependence: towards the consilience of economics and behavioral neuroscience.
    Bickel WK; Yi R; Mueller ET; Jones BA; Christensen DR
    Curr Top Behav Neurosci; 2010; 3():319-41. PubMed ID: 21161759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantification of reinforcing effectiveness: comment on Meisch (2000).
    Carroll ME
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2000 Aug; 8(3):352-4; discussion 362-5. PubMed ID: 10975623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of zolpidem and midazolam self-administration under progressive-ratio schedules: consumer demand and labor supply analyses.
    Rowlett JK; Lelas S
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Aug; 15(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 17696679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binary components of food reinforcement: Amplitude and persistence.
    Epstein LH; Stein JS; Paluch RA; MacKillop J; Bickel WK
    Appetite; 2018 Jan; 120():67-74. PubMed ID: 28847564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Social reinforcement as alternative to sucrose reinforcement is increased by nicotine and methylphenidate in male Fischer-344 rats.
    Martin CD; Bool HM; George AM; Carr KA; Epstein LH; Hawk LW; Richards JB
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):1981-1985. PubMed ID: 29691605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consumption and response output as a function of unit price: manipulation of cost and benefit components.
    Delmendo X; Borrero JC; Beauchamp KL; Francisco MT
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 20190922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavioral economics and empirical public policy.
    Hursh SR; Roma PG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Jan; 99(1):98-124. PubMed ID: 23344991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental scarcity increases the relative reinforcing value of food in food insecure adults.
    Crandall AK; Temple JL
    Appetite; 2018 Sep; 128():106-115. PubMed ID: 29852205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exposure to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) increases subsequent heroin taking but not heroin's reinforcing efficacy: a self-administration study in rats.
    Solinas M; Panlilio LV; Goldberg SR
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2004 Jul; 29(7):1301-11. PubMed ID: 15039767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of progressive ratio schedules versus behavioral economic measures: effect of an alternative reinforcer on the reinforcing efficacy of phencyclidine.
    Rodefer JS; Carroll ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Jul; 132(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 9272765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The behavioral economics of concurrent drug reinforcers: a review and reanalysis of drug self-administration research.
    Bickel WK; DeGrandpre RJ; Higgins ST
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1995 Apr; 118(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 7617816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Behavioral economics: a novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence.
    Bickel WK; DeGrandpre RJ; Higgins ST
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1993 Sep; 33(2):173-92. PubMed ID: 8261882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of reinforcer pathologies: implications for etiology and treatment of addiction.
    Bickel WK; Jarmolowicz DP; Mueller ET; Gatchalian KM
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2011 Oct; 13(5):406-15. PubMed ID: 21732213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contributions of reinforcement schedule histories to our understanding of drug effects in human subjects.
    Weiner H
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1981 Jul; 37():90-104. PubMed ID: 6798470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A behavioral economic analysis of concurrently available money and cigarettes.
    DeGrandpre RJ; Bickel WK; Higgins ST; Hughes JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Mar; 61(2):191-201. PubMed ID: 8169568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reinforcing properties of inhaled substances.
    Wood RW
    Neurobehav Toxicol; 1979; 1 Suppl 1():67-72. PubMed ID: 400898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using the Multiple-Choice Procedure to Measure the Relative Reinforcing Efficacy of Gambling: Initial Validity Evidence Among College Students.
    Butler LH; Irons JG; Bassett DT; Correia CJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2018 Jun; 34(2):513-520. PubMed ID: 28932934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.