139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11257799)
1. A quality measurement framework for managed care organizations.
Zhou Q; Mickey D; Lancaster DR; Epstein D
J Healthc Qual; 2001; 23(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 11257799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: lessons from the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT. Patient Outcomes Research Team.
Finkelstein JA; Lozano P; Streiff KA; Arduino KE; Sisk CA; Wagner EH; Weiss KB; Inui TS
Health Serv Res; 2002 Jun; 37(3):775-89. PubMed ID: 12132605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the quality of workers' compensation health care delivery: the Washington State Occupational Health Services Project.
Wickizer TM; Franklin G; Plaeger-Brockway R; Mootz RD
Milbank Q; 2001; 79(1):5-33. PubMed ID: 11286095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Continually improving the health and value of health care for a population of patients: the panel management process.
Batalden PB; Mohr JJ; Nelson EC; Plume SK; Baker GR; Wasson JH; Stoltz PK; Splaine ME; Wisniewski JJ
Qual Manag Health Care; 1997; 5(3):41-51. PubMed ID: 10168371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Framework for performance measurement of health care networks and health plans.
O'Leary DS; Nadzam DM; Loeb JM; Jessee WF
Manag Care Q; 1995; 3(3):48-53. PubMed ID: 10144133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Balanced scorecard as a framework for driving performance in managed care organizations.
Sahney VK
Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 10181702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality management in managed care.
Reinke WA
Health Care Manag; 1995 Oct; 2(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 10165645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of disease management in pay-for-performance programs for improving the care of chronically ill patients.
Beich J; Scanlon DP; Ulbrecht J; Ford EW; Ibrahim IA
Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Feb; 63(1 Suppl):96S-116S. PubMed ID: 16688926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The RAF method for regulation, assessment, follow-up and continuous improvement of quality of care: conceptual framework.
Fleishman R
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2002; 15(6-7):303-10. PubMed ID: 12500655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monitoring clinical quality in Medicaid managed care.
Bradley EH; Horwitz SM; Grogan CM; Roberto M
Conn Med; 1998 Apr; 62(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9611418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing complex systems: performance management in public health.
Landrum LB; Baker SL
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2004; 10(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15018335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The voyage to total quality: time to course correct: Part II.
Bradford V
Med Interface; 1995 Dec; 8(12):88-90, 92, 94 passim. PubMed ID: 10153525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The association between quality improvement activities performed by managed care organizations and quality of care.
Borenstein J; Badamgarav E; Henning JM; Gano AD; Weingarten SR
Am J Med; 2004 Sep; 117(5):297-304. PubMed ID: 15336578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Case study. Managed care + quality = value. Lovelace Health System has the proof that its equation works.
Hagland M
Trustee; 1997 Jan; 50(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 10164296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Looking at care from the inside out: a conceptual approach to geriatric care.
Splaine M; Batalden P; Nelson E; Plume SK; Wasson JH
J Ambul Care Manage; 1998 Jul; 21(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 10181841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A framework for evaluating governmental quality initiatives: the Wimpole Street principles.
Shaw CD; Nichol D
Int J Qual Health Care; 2000 Aug; 12(4):273-4. PubMed ID: 10985262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing quality of care: new twists from managed care.
Morreim EH
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 10633279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Total quality management issues in managed care.
McLaughlin CP; Kaluzny AD
J Health Care Finance; 1997; 24(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 9327355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The National Outcomes Management Project: a benchmarking collaborative.
Dewan NA; Daniels A; Zieman G; Kramer T
J Behav Health Serv Res; 2000 Nov; 27(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 11070636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the quality control system for managed care in the United States.
McLaughlin CP
Qual Manag Health Care; 1998; 7(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 10344981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
