These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11257982)

  • 1. Perceptual learning without feedback and the stability of stereoscopic slant estimation.
    van Ee R
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):95-114. PubMed ID: 11257982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gradients of relative disparity underlie the perceived slant of stereoscopic surfaces.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2016; 16(5):16. PubMed ID: 26998800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hinge versus twist: the effects of 'reference surfaces' and discontinuities on stereoscopic slant perception.
    Gillam B; Blackburn S; Brooks K
    Perception; 2007; 36(4):596-616. PubMed ID: 17564204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.
    Hillis JM; Watt SJ; Landy MS; Banks MS
    J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):967-92. PubMed ID: 15669906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereoscopic slant reversals: a new kind of 'induced' effect.
    Gillam B
    Perception; 1993; 22(9):1025-36. PubMed ID: 8041585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception.
    Gillam B; Ryan C
    Perception; 1992; 21(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 1437462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.
    Caziot B; Backus BT; Lin E
    J Vis; 2017 Dec; 17(14):4. PubMed ID: 29196763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of large scanning eye movements on stereoscopic slant estimation of large surfaces.
    van Ee R; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(3):467-79. PubMed ID: 10341977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of surface placement and surface overlap on stereo slant contrast and enhancement.
    Gillam BJ; Pianta MJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3083-95. PubMed ID: 16112705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Slant cue are combined early in visual processing: evidence from visual search.
    Sousa R; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 19027776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orientation disparity: a cue for 3D orientation?
    Greenwald HS; Knill DC
    Neural Comput; 2009 Sep; 21(9):2581-604. PubMed ID: 19548796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise causes slant underestimation in stereo and motion.
    Ji H; Fermüller C
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3105-20. PubMed ID: 16750551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface separation decreases stereoscopic slant but a monocular aperture increases it.
    Gillam BJ; Blackburn SG
    Perception; 1998; 27(11):1267-86. PubMed ID: 10505174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local and non-local effects on surface-mediated stereoscopic depth.
    Gillam BJ; Sedgwick HA; Marlow P
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21558480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue conflict and stereoscopic surface slant about horizontal and vertical axes.
    Ryan C; Gillam B
    Perception; 1994; 23(6):645-58. PubMed ID: 7845758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual learning by cue-dependent and cue-invariant mechanisms.
    Ivanchenko V; Jacobs RA
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 17150239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry.
    van Dam LC; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2417-35. PubMed ID: 15894347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: multiple slant signals adapt independently.
    Knapen T; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3381-92. PubMed ID: 16698056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining cues while avoiding perceptual conflicts.
    Hogervorst MA; Brenner E
    Perception; 2004; 33(10):1155-72. PubMed ID: 15693662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.