122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11258160)
1. Age discrimination--disability benefits; public sector. Arnett v. California Public Employees Retirement System, No. 98-15574, __F.3d __(9th Cir.1999).
Benefits Q; 2001; 17(1):76-7. PubMed ID: 11258160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Threat to cut off retiree's health insurance constitutes wrongful retaliation under ERISA ... Stiltner v. Beretta Corp.
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1995 Feb; 12(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 10184679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Age Discrimination in Employment Act; retiree health benefits. Final rule.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Fed Regist; 2007 Dec; 72(246):72938-45. PubMed ID: 18426055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disability discrimination and Parker v. Metropolitan Life: separate, but equal?
Wall BW
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 9554716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statute of Limitations in LTD Termination Appeal. Gordon v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP Group Long-Term Disability Plan, 2014 WL 1394962 (9th Cir. 2014).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 26540948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits Claim Statute of Limitations. Riley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 744 F.3d 241, 57 EBC 2153 (1st Cir. 2014).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):68. PubMed ID: 26540946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Threshold barriers to Title I and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act: discrimination against mental illness in long-term disability benefits.
Firak NL
J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(2):205-308. PubMed ID: 10539295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Public sector health benefits--same-sex domestic partners. Irizarry v. Board of Education of the city of Chicago, 251 F.3d 604 (7th Cir. 2001).
Benefits Q; 2004; 20(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 15015426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-Term Disability Plan Administration. Melech v. Life Insurance Company of North America, 739 F.3d 663, 57 EBC 1800 (11th Cir. 2014).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 26540945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Review of Disability Claim. Hoffman v. Screen Actors Guild--Producers Pension Plan,_Fed. Appx._, 2014 WL 1664400 (9th Cir. 2014).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):71. PubMed ID: 26540949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Ravencraft v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America.
Benefits Q; 2001; 17(2):70-1. PubMed ID: 11372477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The future role of the "bona fide plan" exemption in ADEA benefits discrimination litigation.
Kneisel EM
Employee Relat Law J; 1989-1990 Winter; 15(3):387-402. PubMed ID: 10296963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing replacement rates under private and federal retirement systems.
Martin PP
Soc Secur Bull; 2003-2004; 65(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15218632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits. Final rule.
Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor
Fed Regist; 2016 Dec; 81(243):92316-43. PubMed ID: 28030889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fortier v. Principal Life, 666 F3d 231 (4th Cir. 2012).
Benefits Q; 2013; 29(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 23488090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Collectively bargained plans--disability retirement--time limits for filing claim for benefits--telephone calls as claims.
Benefits Q; 2010; 26(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 20608119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Disclosure--severance from service--breach of fiduciary duty. Harte v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 214 F.3d 446 (3rd Cir. 2000) (opinion after rehearing).
Benefits Q; 2001; 17(3):73-4. PubMed ID: 11521556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Disability plans--mental condition limitations--ADA. Kimber v. Thiokol Corporation, Thiokol Corporation Disability Benefits plan, 196 F.2d 1092 (10th Cir. 1999).
Benefits Q; 2001; 17(3):61-4. PubMed ID: 11521551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Federal Employees Health Benefits program: direct payment of FEHB premiums for annuitants--OPM. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1992 Jan; 57(17):2979. PubMed ID: 10116400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discretion to Deny Benefits. Prezioso v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, 2014 WL 1356862 (8th Cir. 2014).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 26540947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
