122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11258160)
21. ADA--covered entities--shareholder-directors as employees. Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates v. Deborah Wells.
Benefits Q; 2004; 20(3):73-4. PubMed ID: 15453202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 9th Circuit: ADA permits distinctions in group disability insurance plans.
AIDS Policy Law; 2000 Jan; 15(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11367225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. ERISA failures and the erosion of workers' rights: the urgent need to protect private & public workers' pension and benefits.
Allen JP; Bales RA
Albany Law Rev; 2011-2012; 75(1):449-82. PubMed ID: 22452025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Supreme Court refuses appeal in insurance case.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 11365097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: limitation on inpatient hospital charges and FEHB program payments--OPM. Interim regulation with request for comments.
Fed Regist; 1992 Mar; 57(60):10609-10. PubMed ID: 10118274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 6th Circuit: insurance policies are not covered by the ADA.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Aug; 12(15):1, 8-9. PubMed ID: 11364590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An evolving pension system: trends in defined benefit and defined contribution plans.
Rajnes D
EBRI Issue Brief; 2002 Sep; (249):1-58. PubMed ID: 12369393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Disability Claim Provisions. Clark v. Janssen Pharm., Inc., 2015 WL 1567097,_Fed. Appx._(1st Cir. Apr. 8, 2015) unpublished).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(3):60. PubMed ID: 26540964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Sickness benefits. Railroad Retirement Board. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 2000 Nov; 65(215):66498-9. PubMed ID: 11503694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986.
Kerns WL
Soc Secur Bull; 1986 Nov; 49(11):5-10. PubMed ID: 3798304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Problems with employer-provided health insurance--the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and health care reform.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 1992 Dec; 327(23):1682-5. PubMed ID: 1435904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Owens v. Storehouse, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Fed Report; 1993 Feb; 984():394-401. PubMed ID: 11648231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. ERISA preemption and its effects on capping the health benefits of individuals with AIDS: a demonstration of why the United States health and insurance systems require substantial reform.
Palmer L
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 Jul; (185):9-49. PubMed ID: 10171923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Applicability of ADA non-discrimination principles to self-insured health plans: do "AIDS caps" violate the law?
Morgan PJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 11(1):221-51. PubMed ID: 10172301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Adverse selection in a large, multiple-option health benefits program: a case study of the California public employees' retirement system.
Luft HS; Trauner JB; Maerki SC
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1985; 6():197-229. PubMed ID: 10280620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Real story in CalPERS talks lies beyond the headlines.
Carlson B
Manag Care; 2001 May; 10(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11392724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007).
Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Disability plans--treating physician rule. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord.
Benefits Q; 2004; 20(3):70-1. PubMed ID: 15453200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Benefits and the amended ADEA.
Miller EC
Personnel; 1978; 55(5):4-10. PubMed ID: 10239496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Public plans--Americans with Disabilities Act--discrimination-disparate treatment of mental disabilities. Rogers v. Department of Health and Environmental Control, 174 F.3d 431 (4th Cir.1999).
Benefits Q; 2001; 17(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 11258159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
