These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11258370)
1. A question of intent: when is a 'schematic' illustration a fraud? Richardson MK; Keuck G Nature; 2001 Mar; 410(6825):144. PubMed ID: 11258370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pictures of evolution and charges of fraud: Ernst Haeckel's embryological illustrations. Hopwood N Isis; 2006 Jun; 97(2):260-301. PubMed ID: 16892945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The history of the plant embryo. Terminology and visualization from ancient until modern times. Ingensiep HW Hist Philos Life Sci; 2004; 26(3-4):309-31. PubMed ID: 16302691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The N-rays were imagined, but the research was no fraud]. Lynøe N Lakartidningen; 2016 Oct; 113():. PubMed ID: 27754546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Suspended judgment. Is the scientific paper a fraud? Silverman WA Control Clin Trials; 1991 Apr; 12(2):273-6. PubMed ID: 1645639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Picture metamorphosis. The transformation of insects from the end of the seventeenth to the beginning of the nineteenth century]. Wellmann J NTM; 2008; 16(2):183-211. PubMed ID: 19227706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The life and work of James F. Didusch. Altemus AR J Biocommun; 1992; 19(2):8-21. PubMed ID: 1624478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dorcas Hager Padget: artist and embryologist. Sugar O Surg Neurol; 1992 Dec; 38(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 1298113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. De formato foetu. Longo LD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1617-8. PubMed ID: 7503210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific and letter fraud in the Victorian era. Edouard L BMJ; 1995 Dec; 311(7020):1644. PubMed ID: 8555839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A history of normal plates, tables and stages in vertebrate embryology. Hopwood N Int J Dev Biol; 2007; 51(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 17183461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical illustration. The impact of photography on its history. Ollerenshaw R J Biocommun; 2000; 27(2):2-8. PubMed ID: 11050709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Embryological drawings concerning his Theorie von der Generation sent by Caspar Friedrich Wolff to Albrecht von Haller in 1764. Belloni L J Hist Med Allied Sci; 1971 Apr; 26(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 4930793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ophthalmological illustration in Brazil. Retrospective study: 1841-1967]. Tavares ES Arq Bras Oftalmol; 1968; 31(6):158-71. PubMed ID: 4886161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Anatomic illustration and its authors at the Medical School in Prague]. Grim M Sb Lek; 1999; 100(4):315-44. PubMed ID: 11221482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The first scientific dermatologic communication? Cerimele D; Montesu MA G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2011 Jun; 146(3):245-7. PubMed ID: 21566555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stylism in anatomical illustration from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries. Part II. Audette LG J Biocommun; 1979 Jul; 6(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 378991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Riddle of the tenth man. Lutes AO Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):728. PubMed ID: 8657268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]