BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11258580)

  • 1. Fixation of the acetabular cup in cemented total hip replacement: improving the anchorage hole profile using finite element method.
    Mootanah R; Ingle P; Dowell J; Cheah K; Shelton JC
    Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(6):343-55. PubMed ID: 11258580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
    Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Configuration of anchorage holes affects fixation of the acetabular component in cemented total hip replacement--a finite element study.
    Mootanah R; Dowell JK; Cheah K; Ingle P; Shelton JC
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Dec; 10(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 17891573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
    Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of cup outer sizes on the contact mechanics and cement fixation of cemented total hip replacements.
    Hua X; Li J; Wang L; Wilcox R; Fisher J; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Oct; 37(10):1008-14. PubMed ID: 26343226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of cup inclination and wear on the contact mechanics and cement fixation for ultra high molecular weight polyethylene total hip replacements.
    Hua X; Wroblewski BM; Jin Z; Wang L
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Apr; 34(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 21872521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configuration of anchorage holes affects cemented fixation of the acetabular component in total hip replacement: an in vitro study.
    Mootanah R; Jarrett P; Ingle P; Cheah K; Dowell JK; Shelton JC
    Technol Health Care; 2008; 16(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 18334785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parameteric optimisation of materials for acetabular cup.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 11352115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advances in total hip arthroplasty. The metal-backed acetabular component.
    Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Mar; (183):4-11. PubMed ID: 6697600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
    Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Complications with the acetabular cup in the CLS total hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Deduch J; Hudecek F
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11706722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of shear stresses at the implant-bone interface of an acetabular press-fit cup during impingement.
    Voigt C; Klöhn C; Bader R; von Salis-Soglio G; Scholz R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Apr; 52(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17408381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.