These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11258778)

  • 1. Breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty.
    Skinner KA; Silberman H; Dougherty W; Gamagami P; Waisman J; Sposto R; Silverstein MJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Mar; 8(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 11258778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer after breast augmentation with silicone implants.
    Cahan AC; Ashikari R; Pressman P; Cody H; Hoffman S; Sherman JE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 1995 Mar; 2(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 7728564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancer in the augmented breast. Diagnosis and prognosis.
    Clark CP; Peters GN; O'Brien KM
    Cancer; 1993 Oct; 72(7):2170-4. PubMed ID: 8374874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in augmented women.
    Handel N; Silverstein MJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(3):587-93; discussion 594-6. PubMed ID: 16932162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women following augmentation with silicone gel-filled prostheses.
    Silverstein MJ; Handel N; Gamagami P; Gierson ED; Furmanski M; Collins AR; Epstein M; Cohlan BF
    Eur J Cancer; 1992; 28(2-3):635-40. PubMed ID: 1591087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer survival among women under age 50: is mammography detrimental?
    Stacey-Clear A; McCarthy KA; Hall DA; Pile-Spellman E; White G; Hulka C; Whitman GJ; Mahoney E; Kopans DB
    Lancet; 1992 Oct; 340(8826):991-4. PubMed ID: 1357448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Barclay J; Grady D; Sickles EA; Ernster V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jan; 89(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 8978410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging of breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty.
    Leibman AJ; Kruse BD
    Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Feb; 30(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 8387738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer in patients with prior augmentation: presentation, stage, and lymphatic mapping.
    Jakub JW; Ebert MD; Cantor A; Gardner M; Reintgen DS; Dupont EL; Cox CE; Shons AR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Dec; 114(7):1737-42. PubMed ID: 15577343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer after mammary augmentation.
    Schirber S; Thomas WO; Finley JM; Green AE; Ferrara JJ
    South Med J; 1993 Mar; 86(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 8451662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Palpable breast cancers are inherently different from nonpalpable breast cancers.
    Skinner KA; Silberman H; Sposto R; Silverstein MJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):705-10. PubMed ID: 11597010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer in women after augmentation mammoplasty.
    Silverstein MJ; Handel N; Gamagami P; Waisman JR; Gierson ED; Rosser RJ; Steyskal R; Colburn W
    Arch Surg; 1988 Jun; 123(6):681-5. PubMed ID: 2835940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The new era in breast cancer. Invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening.
    Cady B; Stone MD; Schuler JG; Thakur R; Wanner MA; Lavin PT
    Arch Surg; 1996 Mar; 131(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 8611096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics.
    Miglioretti DL; Rutter CM; Geller BM; Cutter G; Barlow WE; Rosenberg R; Weaver DL; Taplin SH; Ballard-Barbash R; Carney PA; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K
    JAMA; 2004 Jan; 291(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 14747501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
    Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
    Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women augmented with silicone gel-filled implants.
    Silverstein MJ; Gierson ED; Gamagami P; Handel N; Waisman JR
    Cancer; 1990 Jul; 66(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 2162244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of silicone implants on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of breast cancer.
    Handel N
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7 Suppl 1):81S-93S. PubMed ID: 18090817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive breast cancer. The dilemma of the 1990s.
    Silverstein MJ
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Dec; 21(4):639-58. PubMed ID: 7731639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975-1999.
    Vacek PM; Geller BM; Weaver DL; Foster RS
    Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2160-8. PubMed ID: 12001112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.