These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11258864)

  • 1. Effect of impactor inlet efficiency on the measurement of wood dust size distribution.
    Li SN; Lundgren DA; Rovell-Rixx D; Ray AE
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11258864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sampling efficiency of modified 37-mm sampling cassettes using computational fluid dynamics.
    Anthony TR; Sleeth D; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 26513395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of High Flow Rate Personal Respirable Samplers When Challenged with Mineral Aerosols of Different Particle Size Distributions.
    Stacey P; Thorpe A; Echt A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 May; 60(4):479-92. PubMed ID: 26865560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A modified Marple-type cascade impactor for assessing aerosol particle size distributions in workplaces.
    Wu YH; Vincent JH
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Oct; 4(10):798-807. PubMed ID: 17763071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.
    Koehler KA; Anthony TR; Van Dyke M; Volckens J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 21965462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities.
    Tatum VL; Ray AE; Rovell-Rixx DC
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the UNC Passive Aerosol Sampler Model Based on Comparison with Commonly Used Aerosol Sampling Methods.
    Shirdel M; Andersson BM; Bergdahl IA; Sommar JN; Wingfors H; Liljelind IE
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Mar; 62(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 29300818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Size distribution of chromate paint aerosol generated in a bench-scale spray booth.
    Sabty-Daily RA; Hinds WC; Froines JR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Jan; 49(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 15596421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field comparison of two inhalable samplers used in Italy to measure the wood dust exposure.
    Campopiano A; Basili F; Angelosanto F; Cannizzaro A; Olori A; Ramires D; Iannò A; Angelici L
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2016 Apr; 22(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27373902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of nebulized particle size distribution with Malvern laser diffraction analyzer versus Andersen cascade impactor and low-flow Marple personal cascade impactor.
    Kwong WT; Ho SL; Coates AL
    J Aerosol Med; 2000; 13(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 11262437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present.
    Lee T; Harper M; Slaven JE; Lee K; Rando RJ; Maples EH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Mar; 55(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 21036895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sampling Efficiency and Performance of Selected Thoracic Aerosol Samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Boivin A; Bau S
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Aug; 61(7):784-796. PubMed ID: 28810686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and performance of UPAS inlets for respirable and thoracic mass sampling.
    Leith D; L'Orange C; Mehaffy J; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020 Jun; 17(6):274-282. PubMed ID: 32282284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of wood dust in three wood products industries.
    Harper M; Muller BS
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 12400909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a novel personal nanoparticle sampler.
    Zhou Y; Irshad H; Tsai CJ; Hung SM; Cheng YS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Feb; 16(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24337074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wood dust particle and mass concentrations and filtration efficiency in sanding of wood materials.
    Welling I; Lehtimäki M; Rautio S; Lähde T; Enbom S; Hynynen P; Hämeri K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Feb; 6(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 19065389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining particle size distributions in the inhalable size range for wood dust collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Muller BS; Bartolucci A
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 12400908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of endotoxin and particle bounce in Marple cascade samplers with and without impaction grease.
    Kirychuk SP; Reynolds SJ; Koehncke N; Nakatsu J; Mehaffy J
    J Agromedicine; 2009; 14(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 19437284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.