These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11259474)

  • 1. More about: improving the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Muney AM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Mar; 93(6):480. PubMed ID: 11259474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: improving the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Loeve F; Brown ML; Boer R; Habbema JD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1691-2. PubMed ID: 11036117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Atkin WS; Whynes DK
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Apr; 92(7):513-4. PubMed ID: 10749896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The case for colorectal cancer screening.
    McMahon PM; Gazelle GS
    Semin Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 35(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 11060919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale.
    von Eyben FE; Thordal C
    Gastroenterology; 1997 Oct; 113(4):1422-3. PubMed ID: 9322543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: Cost-effectiveness studies fan colonoscopy debate.
    Spratt JS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Mar; 93(6):480. PubMed ID: 11259475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness studies fan colonoscopy debate.
    Newman L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Nov; 92(22):1796-8. PubMed ID: 11078753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: results of the Nottingham trial.
    Whynes DK
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 1999 Nov; 32(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 10612015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some reflections on cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Johannesson M; Meltzer D
    Health Econ; 1998 Feb; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9541079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.
    Schnoll-Sussman F; Markowitz AJ; Winawer SJ
    Semin Oncol; 2000 Oct; 27(5 Suppl 10):10-21. PubMed ID: 11049028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Budenholzer B; Welch HG
    JAMA; 2001 Jan 24-31; 285(4):407; author reply 408. PubMed ID: 11242411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Donohoe M
    JAMA; 2001 Jan 24-31; 285(4):407; author reply 408. PubMed ID: 11242412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer: a simulation model.
    Neilson AR; Whynes DK
    IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1995; 12(3-4):355-67. PubMed ID: 8919570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand.
    Zarchy T
    Gastroenterology; 2006 Mar; 130(3):1012; author reply 1012. PubMed ID: 16530546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lag in colorectal screening rates prompts innovation.
    Bowdy M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Jun; 90(12):886-7. PubMed ID: 9637137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.
    Glick SN
    JAMA; 2001 Jan 24-31; 285(4):407-8. PubMed ID: 11242413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Colorectal cancer screening is profitable].
    Pikkarainen P
    Duodecim; 1999; 115(17):1813-4. PubMed ID: 11941648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Colorectal carcinoma].
    Rambow A
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Jun; 127(23):1278. PubMed ID: 12053293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening methods.
    Brenner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S20-2. PubMed ID: 18368634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective cost-effectiveness study of alternative work-up strategies in colorectal cancer screening.
    Brown K; Burrows C
    Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(2):176-89. PubMed ID: 10119049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.